Vol. 145, No. 7 — February 12, 2011
Statutory authorities
Financial Administration Act and National Capital Act
Sponsoring department
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
(This statement is not part of the Regulations.)
In carrying out its programs and providing services to Canadians, the Government of Canada is one of the largest purchasers of goods and services in the country. As such, the Government made a commitment in the Federal Accountability Action Plan to increase the transparency and oversight of government contracting through a regulatory amendment process. Regulation best ensures that all bidders and contractors are made aware of any new conditions regarding entry into contracts with the federal government.
The objective of the appended proposed Regulations is to improve the fairness, openness and transparency of government contracting by deeming integrity clauses to be included implicitly in all federal government bid solicitation documents and procurement contracts. The integrity clauses would thus be considered part of these documents and contracts even if the clauses are not explicitly expressed.
The proposed Regulations would amend the Government Contracts Regulations (GCRs) to deem certain specified integrity clauses to be expressly set out in government contracts for construction, goods or services. It would also give contracting authorities the power to terminate a contract and require the return of any advance payment if a contractor makes a false declaration or fails to comply with a term that is deemed to be present. This is pursuant to amendments to the Financial Administration Act (FAA) made through the Federal Accountability Act (FedAA), which was assented to on December 12, 2006. In other words, the clauses would be an implicit part of a solicitation or contract even if the clauses are not explicitly contained in the solicitation or contract documents.
The FAA is “an Act to provide for the financial administration of the Government of Canada, the establishment and maintenance of the accounts of Canada and the control of Crown corporations.” The related GCRs establish the conditions of contract entry and the security requirements for government contracts. The approach of including a deemed contract provision is not novel since a similar provision has been included in section 40 of the FAA for over 10 years (i.e. it is a term of every contract that any payment under that contract is subject to there being an appropriation for the particular service in the fiscal year in which any commitment under that contract would come due).
Treasury Board’s Contracting Policy already prohibits the payment of contingency fees to consultant lobbyists, and the Criminal Code already prohibits people convicted of fraud from contracting with the government. In addition, Treasury Board provides guidelines to departments regarding the public disclosure of contracts over $10,000.
The proposed amendments would increase administrative transparency, oversight and accountability for procurement by deeming terms to be expressly stated in contracts that
Amendment to the GCRs under 42(1)(a) of the FAA
In Treasury Board’s Contracting Policy, section 8.11 and Appendix M prohibit contractors from paying contingency fees to consultant lobbyists. The proposed amendment would convert these policy requirements into regulations by deeming clauses that have the same effect as the policy to be expressly set out in contracts.
Amendment to the GCRs based on paragraph 42(1)(c) of the FAA
Following the intent of the current contracting policy requirements (as informed by the recent amendment to the Criminal Code through the FedAA), this amendment to the GCRs would deem a clause to be expressed in every procurement contract to prohibit people who are convicted of fraud against the government from entering into the contract. This prohibition is already in the Criminal Code and is reflected in the Contracting Policy, section 12.5.1, as follows:
The Criminal Code, section 748, subsection 3 [now section 750(3)], prohibits anyone who has been convicted of an offence under
from holding public office, contracting with the government or receiving a benefit from a government contract, unless the Governor in Council has restored (in whole or in part) these capabilities to the individual or the individual has received a pardon.
The FedAA amended the Criminal Code and the FAA to create new fraud provisions and included them in subsection 750(3) of the Criminal Code. However, since few people have been convicted of an offence under the old provisions of the Criminal Code, and since there have been no convictions under the new provision, there is little possibility that any current contractor would be affected by converting the policy requirement into a regulation. Further, the consequence of any non-compliance with the proposed Regulations would be limited to a breach of contract. Finally, there is no known reason why any person would object to including this prohibition in contracts. Suppliers and Canadians would reasonably expect that people who have been convicted of certain criminal offences should not be allowed to enter into a contract with the federal government.
Amendment to the GCRs based on paragraph 42(1)(e) of the FAA
Government departments currently disclose contracts over $10,000. Under the proposed deemed clause, the contractor would consent to the publication of basic information about the contract (including the vendor’s name, the reference number, the contract date, the description of work, the contract period, the contract value and comments). Publication of this information enables all Canadians to be better informed about federal government acquisitions.
Amendment to the GCRs based on subsection 42(1) of the FAA
A contractor’s non-compliance with a deemed term would give the contracting authority the power to terminate a contract and require the contractor to return any advance payment. This deemed clause mitigates the risk of a contractor making false declarations to obtain a contract or revoking his or her agreement to allow publication of basic information about the contract after its award, both of which Canadians would be expected to find unacceptable. In addition, the deemed clause mitigates the risk to the reputation of the Government of Canada should these circumstances occur.
Other amendments
This proposal contains other amendments to the GCRs:
Option 1: Maintain current Regulations without changes
This option was rejected because it would not fulfill the implied will of Parliament to deem certain clauses to be in contracts, as per the Government’s commitment in the Federal Accountability Action Plan. Further, during committee hearings into the relevant sections of the FedAA, committee members understood that the intent of section 312 of the FedAA was to improve the transparency and oversight of the government procurement process and that additional analysis was needed before incorporating the requirements directly into the FAA.
Option 2: Amend the GCRs to fix terms that are deemed to be in contracts
This option involves making the coordinating amendments and the non-controversial regulatory amendments described above to bring into force the intention of the FedAA. The proposed Regulations have been analyzed to determine that the risk of creating unintended consequences is low.
The proposed amendments would not impose any new costs on departments that are not already required under the Contracting Policy and other government policies. There would be no imposition of additional requirements on other stakeholders. The amendments would improve the fairness, openness and transparency of the procurement process by including integrity clauses in procurement contracts.
The FedAA involved extensive consultations and public involvement. Dozens of witnesses were called to two parliamentary committees studying the Bill that led to the FedAA. The committees held over 40 meetings during 2006, and Parliamentarians debated the Bill for 22 days before passing it.
The provisions dealing with lobbyists, fraud and proactive disclosure were addressed in several committee hearings and became the subject of amendments discussed and passed in both the House of Commons and the Senate.
A first set of proposed regulatory amendments were pre-published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, on September 29, 2007, for public input. The consultation period lasted 30 days. Comments received from Public Works and Government Services Canada were technical in nature and have been incorporated into the appended proposed Regulations.
To ensure that there were no further concerns after the pre-publication period, the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat invited comments from the Privy Council Office regarding commissions of inquiry and also from the Office of the Communications Security Establishment Commissioner. Feedback was also invited from the offices of Agents of Parliament, the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Department of Justice and the National Capital Commission. All responses have been incorporated into the appended proposed Regulations.
Additional technical issues arose in redrafting the Regulations following the initial pre-publication period. For example, it was discovered that the GCRs appeared to limit the application of Part III of the FAA, which is inconsistent with the power to make regulations. Deleting the definition of “contract” corrected this situation, but required coordinating amendments with other regulations and holding another round of consultations to ensure that there were no other impacts on stakeholders. The changes have been incorporated into the appended proposed Regulations.
The proposed Regulations will again be pre-published due to the time that has passed since the first pre-publication and the number of changes that have been made as a result of the consultations.
The compliance and enforcement of the GCRs would remain the same. In addition, should someone be found to have made a false declaration, the contracting authority would be authorized to terminate the contract and require the contractor to return any advance payments.
Glenn Richardson
Senior Policy Analyst
Acquired Services and Assets Sector
Office of the Comptroller General
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
L’Esplanade Laurier
140 O’Connor Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0R5
Telephone: 613-941-7179
Fax: 613-957-2405
Email: Glenn.Richardson@tbs-sct.gc.ca
Notice is hereby given that the Governor in Council, pursuant to subsections 41(1) (see footnote a) and 42(1) (see footnote b) of the Financial Administration Act (see footnote c) and subsection 15(3) (see footnote d) of the National Capital Act (see footnote e), proposes to make the annexed Regulations Amending the Government Contracts Regulations.
Interested persons may make representations concerning the proposed Regulations within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. All such representations must cite the Canada Gazette, Part I, and the date of publication of this notice, and be addressed to Glenn Richardson, Senior Policy Analyst, Acquired Services and Assets Sector, Office of the Controller General, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R5 (tel.: 613-941-7179; fax: 613-957-2405; e-mail: Glenn.Richardson@tbs-sct.gc.ca).
Ottawa, February 3, 2011
JURICA ČAPKUN
Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council
REGULATIONS AMENDING THE GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS REGULATIONS
AMENDMENTS
1. (1) The definition “contract” in section 2 of the Gover n ment Contracts Regulations (see footnote 1) is repealed.
(2) The definition “contracting authority” in section 2 of the Regulations is replaced by the following:
“contracting authority” means
2. (1) The portion of section 3 of the Regulations before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:
3. (1) These Regulations apply to all goods, service and construction contracts that are entered into by a contracting authority and that provide for the payment of any money by Her Majesty, except
(2) Paragraphs 3(1)(d) and (e) of the Regulations are replaced by the following:
(3) The Regulations are amended by adding the following after subsection 3(1):
(2) Despite paragraph (1)(d), section 4 applies to a contract for the performance of legal services.
(3) Despite subsection (1), section 18 applies to any contract referred to in that subsection.
3. The heading before section 4 of the French version of the Regulations is replaced by the following:
PRESTATION DE SERVICES JURIDIQUES
4. Section 4 of the Regulations is replaced by the following:
4. It is a condition under which a contract for the performance of legal services may be entered into that the Minister of Justice approve the entering into of the contract, except in respect of a contracting authority referred to in the schedule.
5. The Regulations are amended by adding the following after section 17:
PART III
DEEMED TERMS
18. (1) The following terms are deemed to be expressly set out in every construction, goods or service contract that provides for the payment of any money by Her Majesty:
(2) The following terms are deemed to be expressly set out in every bid solicitation for a construction, goods or service contract that provides for the payment of any money by Her Majesty:
6. The Regulations are amended by adding, after section 18, the schedule set out in the schedule to these Regulations.
COMING INTO FORCE
7. These Regulations come into force on the day on which they are registered.
SCHEDULE
(Section 6)
SCHEDULE
(Section 4)
CONTRACTING AUTHORITIES EXEMPTED FROM SECTION 4
The Auditor General of Canada
Le vérificateur général du Canada
The Chief Electoral Officer of Canada
Le directeur général des élections
The Commissioner of Lobbying
Le commissaire au lobbying
The Commissioner of Official Languages
Le commissaire aux langues officielles
The Commissioner of the Communications Security Establishment
Le commissaire du Centre de la sécurité des télécommunications
The Director of Public Prosecutions
Le directeur des poursuites pénales
The Information Commissioner of Canada
Le commissaire à l’information du Canada
The Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Le commissaire à la vie privée du Canada
The Public Sector Integrity Commissioner of Canada
Le commissaire à l’intégrité du secteur public
[7-1-o]
Footnote a
S.C. 2006, c. 9, s. 311
Footnote b
S.C. 2006, c. 9, s. 312
Footnote c
R.S., c. F-11
Footnote d
R.S., c. 5 (4th Supp.), s. 6(2)
Footnote e
R.S., c. N-4
Footnote 1
SOR/87-402
NOTICE:
The format of the electronic version of this issue of the Canada Gazette was modified in order to be compatible with extensible hypertext markup language (XHTML 1.0 Strict).