ARCHIVED — Vol. 146, No. 5 — February 4, 2012

COMMISSIONS

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of a charity

The following notice of proposed revocation was sent to the charity listed below revoking it for failure to meet the parts of the Income Tax Act as listed in this notice:

“Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraphs 168(1)(b) and 168(1)(e) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the organization listed below under subsection 149.1(2) of the Income Tax Act and that the revocation of registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice.”

Business Number

Name/Address

864463724RR0001

AMAZING FACTS CANADA, CRESTON, B.C.

CATHY HAWARA
Director General
Charities Directorate

[5-1-o]

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of charities

Following a request from the charities listed below to have their status as a charity revoked, the following notice of intention to revoke was sent:

“Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraph 168(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charities listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(a) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette.”

Business Number

Name/Address

103018537RR0001

CLUB FAMILIAL RENÉ GOUPIL INC ., MONTRÉAL (QC)

107876476RR0008

ST. ALPHONSUS’ CHURCH, CALLANDER, ONT.

107876476RR0009

OUR LADY OF PEACE CHURCH, CAPREOL, ONT.

107876476RR0024

CORPUS CHRISTI CHURCH, NORTH BAY, ONT.

107876476RR0029

BLESSED SACRAMENT CHURCH, SAULT STE. MARIE, ONT.

107876476RR0031

OUR LADY OF MOUNT CARMEL CHURCH, SAULT STE. MARIE, ONT.

107876476RR0035

ST. JOSEPH THE WORKER CHURCH, SAULT STE. MARIE, ONT.

107876476RR0044

HOLY TRINITY CHURCH, SUDBURY, ONT.

107876476RR0049

ST. ANTHONY’S CHURCH, SUDBURY, ONT.

107876476RR0073

PAROISSE DE LA RÉSURRECTION, STURGEON FALLS (ONT.)

107876476RR0084

PAROISSE STS-ANGES, NORTH BAY (ONT.)

107998676RR0001

THE SPARWOOD COMMUNITY CARE SOCIETY, SPARWOOD, B.C.

118793082RR0001

ASSOCIATION DES FAMILLES D’ACCUEIL DE L’ESTRIE INC., SHERBROOKE (QC)

118818491RR0072

NATIVE NEWSTART SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH, VANCOUVER, B.C.

118842244RR0001

CENTENNIAL ROUGE UNITED CHURCH, SCARBOROUGH, ONT.

118850486RR0001

CHARNWOOD CO-OPERATIVE NURSERY SCHOOL CORPORATION, OAKVILLE, ONT.

118887389RR0001

DORAY ENTERPRISES INC., WINNIPEG, MAN.

118937085RR0001

GEORGE P. VANIER BAND PARENTS ASSOCIATION, FALL RIVER, N.S.

118937903RR0001

GESTALT INSTITUTE OF CANADA, VICTORIA, B.C.

118949007RR0001

GRYPHON THEATRE FOUNDATION, BARRIE, ONT.

119030500RR0001

MANITOBA MEDICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC., WINNIPEG, MAN.

119108660RR0001

FAMILY YMCA OF ST. THOMAS-ELGIN, ST. THOMAS, ONT.

119170223RR0002

ST. CATHERINE’S CHURCH, EAST ST. PAUL, MAN.

119232494RR0001

THE FAIRVIEW COLLEGE FOUNDATION, GRANDE PRAIRIE, ALTA.

119266906RR0001

THE TORONTO MENDELSSOHN CHOIR FOUNDATION, TORONTO, ONT.

119304228RR0001

WORD OF LIFE MINISTRIES, ABBOTSFORD, B.C.

125502849RR0001

FORT ERIE MUSEUM BOARD, RIDGEWAY, ONT.

129248001RR0001

CHURCH OF ST WILFRID, TORONTO, ONT.

131587685RR0001

MOUNTAIN-VALLEY PASTORAL CHARGE, KNOWLTON, QUE.

133087080RR0001

SEKAI & CO / CENTRE OF CONTEMPORARY ARTS /
SÉKAÏ & CO / CENTRE EXPÉRIMENTAL D’ARTS ACTUELS, MONTRÉAL, QUE.

135178069RR0001

THE SMALL CRAFT AQUATIC CENTRE OF FREDERICTON INC., FREDERICTON, N.B.

135398600RR0001

CONFERENCE HOUSING CHARITABLE ASSOCIATION, COQUITLAM, B.C.

804947471RR0001

PANOS FOUNDATION OF CANADA/
FONDATION PANOS DU CANADA, VANCOUVER, B.C.

809419211RR0001

LIFE CAMPUS MINISTRY, GLOUCESTER, ONT.

823361878RR0001

LIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP, STRATFORD, ONT.

825735541RR0001

HEALING VINE MINISTRIES, PETERBOROUGH, ONT.

830901419RR0001

THE S.N.A.I.L. (SAVE NATURE AND IMPROVE LIFE) FOUNDATION, TORONTO, ONT.

849103791RR0001

COMMON INTEREST INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY, KAMLOOPS, B.C.

856759881RR0001

THE NEW VISTA FOUNDATION, BURNABY, B.C.

861104388RR0001

SOCIÉTÉ D’ARTS CONTEMPORAINS CYCLE 13.01 -
SOCIETY OF CONTEMPORARY ARTS CYCLE 13.01, MONTRÉAL (QC)

862190121RR0001

ST. FRANCIS COMMUNITY MINISTRIES LTD., ROCHESTER, ALTA.

863685343RR0001

CENTRE FOR SPIRITUAL ENRICHMENT OF CALGARY, CALGARY, ALTA.

863855458RR0001

FONDATION LA NORDITUDE, SAINT-BRUNO (QC)

864258975RR0001

RENEWED STRENGTH INC., AJAX, ONT.

865137293RR0001

THE 51 DIVISION TORONTO POLICE SCHOLARSHIP AND READING RECOVERY FUND, MARKHAM, ONT.

865291017RR0001

EXPRESSIVE COMMUNICATION HELP ORGANIZATION (E.C.H.O.), THORNHILL, ONT.

870343464RR0001

PRAIRIE YOUTH AND FAMILY HEALING FOUNDATION INC., SASKATOON, SASK.

871135067RR0001

GRANDPARENTS FAMILY WORKSHOP (ONTARIO), WHITBY, ONT.

872499561RR0001

GRACE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST APOSTOLIC INC., HAMILTON, ONT.

881172423RR0001

KOREAN PILGRIM CHURCH, TORONTO, ONT.

887903664RR0001

LANGLEY BIBLE STUDENTS, SURREY, B.C.

888137114RR0001

PRINCE ALBERT LIVE-IN SOCIETY, PRINCE ALBERT, SASK.

889426375RR0001

PROMOTION DE LA FAMILLE OUVRIÈRE MARIE VALÉRIE, SAINT-LAMBERT (QC)

889685657RR0001

FONDATION GAUDIUM ET SPES, LÉVIS (QC)

890109424RR0001

RAINY CITY GAY MEN’S CHORUS, VANCOUVER, B.C.

891423543RR0001

THE NADASDY FOUNDATION FOR FINE ARTS AND THE ENVIRONMENT
LA FONDATION NADASDY POUR LES BEAUX ARTS ET L’ENVIRONNEMENT, OTTAWA, ONT.

893050609RR0001

ORILLIA NON-PROFIT PLACES FOR PEOPLE CORPORATION, COLDWATER, ONT.

893674465RR0001

BEREAVEMENT RESOURCE COUNCIL OF ELGIN, ST. THOMAS, ONT.

895192730RR0001

BEREAVED JEWISH FAMILIES OF ONTARIO, TORONTO, ONT.

898841119RR0001

JEUNESSE POUR JÉSUS, WINDSOR (QC)

899239818RR0001

ETHEL CADOTTE TRUST - RESTORATION FUND, TORONTO, ONT.

CATHY HAWARA
Director General
Charities Directorate

[5-1-o]

CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR OFFSHORE PETROLEUM BOARD

CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND ATLANTIC ACCORD IMPLEMENTATION ACT

Call for Bids No. NL11-01

The Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board hereby gives notice of the terms and conditions of the interests issued as a result of Call for Bids No. NL11-01. The bids selected, and the information contained on the prescribed bid forms, were published in the CanadaGazette, Part Ⅰ, on December 17, 2011.

This notice is made pursuant to and subject to the Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act, S.C. 1987, c. 3, and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Newfoundland and Labrador Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. C-2.

Exploration Licence Nos. 1127 and 1128 were issued to the following interest owners:

Exploration Licence

Interest Owners

Ownership %

1127

Ptarmigan Energy Inc.

100.00%

1128

Ptarmigan Energy Inc.

100.00%

The following is a summary of the terms and conditions of the above exploration licences:

1. The exploration licences confer

  1. (a) the right to explore for, and the exclusive right to drill and test for, petroleum;

  2. (b) the exclusive right to develop those portions of the offshore area in order to produce petroleum; and

  3. (c) the exclusive right, subject to compliance with the other provisions of the Act, to obtain a production licence.

2. The exploration licences were issued for a nine-year term effective January 15, 2012.

3. Period I is a period of five years commencing on the effective date of the licences. The interest owners shall commence the drilling of the well within Period I, and diligently pursue such drilling thereafter, as a condition precedent to obtaining tenure during Period II.

4. The interest owners may at their option extend Period I from five years to six years by providing to the Board, before the end of the fifth year of Period I, either

  1. (a) a description of 50% contiguous Licence Lands to be surrendered together with a refundable drilling deposit of $250,000; or

  2. (b) a $1,000,000 refundable drilling deposit.

A drilling deposit posted pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) above will be refunded in full if the Licence is validated for Period II by the drilling of a well on that licence. No interest will be paid on the drilling deposit.

If a validation well is not drilled, the drilling deposit will be forfeited to the Receiver General for Canada upon the termination of the Licence at the end of Period I. Allowable Expenditures cannot be applied against the drilling deposit.

5. Upon the expiration of Period II, there shall be a deemed surrender of the interest except as it relates to the lands or any portion thereof subject to a significant discovery licence, or a production licence.

6. The interest owners for the above exploration licences were required to provide the following security deposits in the form of a promissory note satisfactory to the Board:

Exploration Licence

Security Deposit

1127

$125,250

1128

$375,250

A credit against the deposit will be made following each anniversary date of each respective exploration licence on the basis of 25% of allowable expenditures. Any deposit balance remaining at the end of Period I, or following the termination of a well commenced and being pursued diligently but not terminated within Period I, or upon the surrender of rights, will be forfeited.

7. For each licence, rentals will be applicable only in Period II at a rate of $5.00 per hectare in respect of the first year and increasing thereafter by $2.50 per hectare per year, up to and including the third year. Rentals for the fourth year will be $7.50 per hectare.

8. Other terms and conditions referred to in the licences include provisions respecting Significant Discoveries, Allowable Expenditures, Indemnity, Liability, Successors and Assigns, Notice, Waiver and Relief, Appointment of Representative and Agreement by Interest Owners.

9. For the payment of a prescribed service fee, the exploration licences may be inspected or, by written request, certified copies made available at the following address: Office of the Registrar, Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board, TD Place, 5th Floor, 140 Water Street, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador A1C 6H6, 709-778-1400.

January 2012

MAX RUELOKKE, P.Eng.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

[5-1-o]

CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR OFFSHORE PETROLEUM BOARD

CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND ATLANTIC ACCORD IMPLEMENTATION ACT

Call for Bids No. NL11-02

The Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board hereby gives notice of the terms and conditions of the interests issued as a result of Call for Bids No. NL11-02. The bids selected, and the information contained on the prescribed bid forms, were published in the CanadaGazette, Part Ⅰ, on December 17, 2011.

This notice is made pursuant to and subject to the Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act, S.C. 1987, c. 3, and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Newfoundland and Labrador Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. C-2.

Exploration Licence Nos. 1125 and 1126 were issued to the following interest owners:

Exploration Licence

Interest Owners

Ownership %

1125

Statoil Canada Limited
Chevron Canada Limited
Repsol E & P Canada Ltd.

50.00%
40.00%
10.00%

1126

Statoil Canada Ltd.
Chevron Canada Limited
Repsol E & P Canada Ltd.

50.00%
40.00%
10.00%

The following is a summary of the terms and conditions of the above exploration licences:

1. The exploration licences confer

  1. (a) the right to explore for, and the exclusive right to drill and test for, petroleum;

  2. (b) the exclusive right to develop those portions of the offshore area in order to produce petroleum; and

  3. (c) the exclusive right, subject to compliance with the other provisions of the Act, to obtain a production licence.

2. The exploration licences were issued for a nine-year term effective January 15, 2012.

3. Period I is a period of six years commencing on the effective date of the licences. The interest owners shall commence the drilling of the well within Period I, and diligently pursue such drilling thereafter, as a condition precedent to obtaining tenure during Period II.

4. The interest owners may at their option extend Period I from six years to seven years by providing to the Board, before the end of the sixth year of Period I, either

  1. (a) a description of 50% contiguous Licence Lands to be surrendered together with a refundable drilling deposit of $1,000,000; or

  2. (b) a $5,000,000 refundable drilling deposit.

If a drilling deposit is posted in accordance with paragraph (a) or (b) above, it will be refunded in full if the Licence is validated for Period II by the drilling of a well on that licence. No interest will be paid on the drilling deposit.

If a validation well is not drilled, the drilling deposit will be forfeited to the Receiver General for Canada upon the termination of the Licence at the end of Period I. Allowable Expenditures cannot be applied against the drilling deposit.

5. Upon the expiration of Period II, there shall be a deemed surrender of the interest except as it relates to the lands or any portion thereof subject to a significant discovery licence, or a production licence.

6. The interest owners for the above exploration licences were required to provide the following security deposits in the form of a promissory note satisfactory to the Board:

Exploration Licence

Security Deposit

1125

$50,542,849

1126

$36,400,418

A credit against the deposit will be made following each anniversary date of each respective exploration licence on the basis of 25% of allowable expenditures. Any deposit balance remaining at the end of Period I, or following the termination of a well commenced and being pursued diligently but not terminated within Period I, or upon the surrender of rights, will be forfeited.

7. For each licence, rentals will be applicable only in Period II at a rate of $5.00 per hectare in respect of the first year and increasing thereafter by $2.50 per hectare per year, up to and including the third year.

8. Other terms and conditions referred to in the licences include provisions respecting Significant Discoveries, Allowable Expenditures, Indemnity, Liability, Successors and Assigns, Notice, Waiver and Relief, Appointment of Representative and Agreement by Interest Owners.

9. For the payment of a prescribed service fee, the exploration licences may be inspected or, by written request, certified copies made available at the following address: Office of the Registrar, Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board, TD Place, 5th Floor, 140 Water Street, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador A1C 6H6, 709-778-1400.

January 2012

MAX RUELOKKE, P.Eng.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

APPEAL

Notice No. HA-2011-024

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) will hold a public hearing to consider the appeal referenced hereunder. This hearing will be held beginning at 9:30 a.m., in the Tribunal’s Hearing Room No. 2, 18th Floor, Standard Life Centre, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario. Interested persons planning to attend should contact the Tribunal at 613-998-9908 to obtain further information and to confirm that the hearing will be held as scheduled.

Customs Act

Frito-Lay Canada, Inc. v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency

Date of Hearing: February 28, 2012

Appeal No.: AP-2010-002

Goods in Issue: Cheetos® snacks

Issue: Whether the jurisdictional requirements of subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act have been fulfilled and, if so, whether the appeal concerning the origin of the goods in issue should be allowed.

January 27, 2012

By order of the Tribunal
DOMINIQUE LAPORTE
Secretary

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

COMMENCEMENT OF INQUIRY

Stainless steel sinks

Notice was received by the Secretary of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) on January 25, 2012, from the Director General of the Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate at the Canada Border Services Agency, stating that preliminary determinations have been made respecting the dumping and subsidizing of stainless steel sinks with a single drawn bowl having a volume between 1 600 and 5 000 cubic inches (26 219.30 and 81 935.32 cubic centimetres) or with multiple drawn bowls having a combined volume between 2 200 and 6 800 cubic inches (36 051.54 and 111 432.04 cubic centimetres), excluding sinks fabricated by hand, originating in or exported from the People’s Republic of China.

Pursuant to section 42 of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), the Tribunal has initiated an inquiry (Inquiry No. NQ-2011-002) to determine whether the dumping and subsidizing of the above-mentioned goods have caused injury or retardation or are threatening to cause injury, and to determine such other matters as the Tribunal is required to determine under that section.

Under section 46 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, a person who provides information to the Tribunal and who wishes some or all of the information to be kept confidential must submit to the Tribunal, at the time the information is provided, a statement designating the information as confidential, together with an explanation as to why that information is designated as confidential. Furthermore, the person must submit a non-confidential summary of the information designated as confidential or a statement indicating why such a summary cannot be made.

Notices of participation

Each person or government wishing to participate in the inquiry and at the hearing as a party must file a notice of participation with the Secretary on or before February 8, 2012. Each counsel who intends to represent a party in the inquiry and at the hearing must file a notice of representation, as well as a declaration and undertaking, with the Secretary on or before February 8, 2012.

Public hearing

A public hearing relating to this inquiry will be held in the Tribunal’s Hearing Room No. 1, 18th Floor, Standard Life Centre, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario, commencing on April 23, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.

To allow the Tribunal to determine whether simultaneous interpretation will be required for the hearing, each interested party and each counsel filing a notice of participation or representation must advise the Secretary, at the same time that they file their notice, whether they and their witnesses will be using English or French or both languages at the hearing.

In the event of an injury finding, a request for a public interest inquiry conducted pursuant to subsection 45(1) of SIMA may be made by any party to the injury inquiry or by any other group or person affected by the injury finding. Such a request must be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the injury finding. A public interest inquiry is completely separate from an injury inquiry. The Tribunal is not seeking and does not expect submissions on public interest issues during the injury inquiry.

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal Rules govern these proceedings.

In order to observe and understand production processes, the Tribunal, accompanied by its staff, may conduct plant visits.

Along with the notice of commencement of inquiry, the Secretary has sent a letter to the domestic producers, importers, foreign producers and certain purchasers with a known interest in the inquiry providing details on the procedures, as well as the schedule for the inquiry. The letter specifies, among other things, the dates for filing replies to Tribunal questionnaires, the date on which the information on record will be made available by the Tribunal to interested parties and counsel that have filed notices of participation or representation, and the dates for the filing of submissions by interested parties. Copies of all the questionnaires can be downloaded from the Tribunal’s Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca/question/index_e.asp.

The Tribunal’s Guide to Making Requests for Product Exclusions, which can be found on the Tribunal’s Web site, describes the procedure for filing requests for specific product exclusions. The Guide includes a form for filing a request for product exclusion and a form for any party that opposes a request to respond to such request. This does not preclude parties from making submissions in a different format if they so wish, provided that all of the information and supporting documentation requested in the forms are included. Requests to exclude a product from the finding shall be filed by interested parties no later than noon, on March 23, 2012. Parties opposed or consenting or not opposed to the request for product exclusion shall file written reply submissions no later than noon, on April 3, 2012. Should the request for a specific product exclusion be opposed, and if the interested party wishes to reply, it must do so no later than noon, on April 10, 2012.

Written submissions, correspondence and requests for information regarding this notice should be addressed to the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Parties and the public may file documents electronically with the Tribunal through its Secure E-filing Service at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca/apps/index_e.asp. The information is fully encrypted from the sender to the Tribunal.

Parties must still file paper copies when instructed to do so. Where a party is required to file hard copies, the electronic version and the hard-copy version must be identical. In case of discrepancies, the hard-copy version will be considered the original.

At the end of these proceedings, the Tribunal will issue a decision supported by a summary of the case, a summary of the arguments and an analysis of the case. The decision will be posted on its Web site and distributed to the parties and interested persons, as well as to organizations and persons that have registered to receive decisions of the Tribunal.

Written and oral communication with the Tribunal may be in English or in French.

Ottawa, January 26, 2012

DOMINIQUE LAPORTE
Secretary

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

DETERMINATION

EDP hardware and software

Notice is hereby given that, after completing its inquiry, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) made a determination (File No. PR-2011-041) on January 24, 2012, with respect to a complaint filed by FreeBalance Inc. (FreeBalance), of Ottawa, Ontario, pursuant to subsection 30.11(1) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, R.S.C. 1985 (4th Supp.), c. 47, concerning a procurement (Solicitation No. 1000299304) by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). The solicitation was for the provision of a product to modernize the Revenue Management System.

FreeBalance alleged that the CRA invoked the limited tendering provisions of the applicable trade agreements without sufficient justification. Additionally, FreeBalance alleged that the CRA improperly rejected the Statement of Capabilities it submitted in response to the Advance Contract Award Notice.

Having examined the evidence presented by the parties and considered the provisions of the Agreement on Internal Trade, the North American Free Trade Agreement, the Agreement on Government Procurement, the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement and the Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement, the Tribunal determined that the complaint was valid.

Further information may be obtained from the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, Standard Life Centre, 15th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Ottawa, January 24, 2012

DOMINIQUE LAPORTE
Secretary

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The Commission posts on its Web site the decisions, notices of consultation and regulatory policies that it publishes, as well as information bulletins and orders. On April 1, 2011, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure came into force. As indicated in Part 1 of these Rules, some broadcasting applications are posted directly on the Commission’s Web site, www.crtc.gc.ca, under “Part 1 Applications.”

To be up to date on all ongoing proceedings, it is important to regularly consult “Today’s Releases” on the Commission’s Web site, which includes daily updates to notices of consultation that have been published and ongoing proceedings, as well as a link to Part 1 applications.

The following documents are abridged versions of the Commission’s original documents. The original documents contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including the locations and addresses where the complete files for the proceeding may be examined. These documents are posted on the Commission’s Web site and may also be examined at the Commission’s offices and public examination rooms. Furthermore, all documents relating to a proceeding, including the notices and applications, are posted on the Commission’s Web site under “Public Proceedings.”

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PART 1 APPLICATIONS

The following applications were posted on the Commission’s Web site between January 20, 2012, and January 26, 2012:

Ethnic Channels Group Limited
Toronto, Ontario
2012-0051-8
Addition of 2M Maroc, a non-Canadian service, to the list of non-Canadian programming services authorized for distribution
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: February 20, 2012

Astral Media Radio inc.
Val d’Or, Quebec
2012-0041-9
Amendment to the technical parameters of CJMV-FM
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: February 20, 2012

Radio communautaire Cornwall-Alexandria inc.
Cornwall, Ontario
2012-0031-0
Amendment to the technical parameters of CHOD-FM
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: February 20, 2012

V Interactions inc.
Saguenay, Quebec
2012-0072-4
Amendment to the technical parameters of CFRS-DT
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: February 24, 2012

Northern Native Broadcasting, Yukon
Whitehorse, Yukon Territory
2011-1669-0
Addition of a transmitter for CHON-FM
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: February 24, 2012

Northern Native Broadcasting, Yukon
Whitehorse, Yukon Territory
2011-1668-2
Addition of a transmitter for CHON-FM
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: February 24, 2012

[5-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2012-32 January 23, 2012

City West Cable and Telephone Corporation
Across Canada

Approved — Addition of Hope Channel TV to the list of non-Canadian programming services authorized for distribution.

2012-49 January 24, 2012

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Vancouver and Pemberton, British Columbia

Approved — Application to amend the broadcasting licence for the English-language AM radio station CBU Vancouver in order to operate an FM transmitter at Pemberton to replace its existing low-power AM transmitter CBXK.

2012-51 January 26, 2012

Bell Media Inc.
Barrie, Burlington, Fonthill, Fort Erie, Hamilton, Niagara Falls, St. Catharines, Oakville and Welland, Ontario

Approved — Applications to amend the broadcasting licence for the conventional television station CKVR-DT Barrie in order to add two digital transmitters to serve the areas of Burlington, Fonthill, Fort Erie, Hamilton, Niagara Falls, St. Catharines, Oakville and Welland.

[5-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions, undertakings and orders on claims for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decisions of the screening officer, respecting each claim for exemption and the relevant material safety data sheet (MSDS) and (where applicable) the label, listed below.

Claimant

Product Identifier
(As shown on the MSDS)

Registry Number

MSDS Preparation Date
(As shown on the MSDS)

Date of
Decision

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

TecGARD 753

7298

4/16/2008

May 12, 2011

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park,
New Jersey
(formerly West Paterson, New Jersey)

METLBOND® 6726 Primer

7354

06/17/2008

May 5, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 581
Performance
Additive

7358

7/7/2008

June 24, 2011

Calfrac Well Services Ltd., Calgary, Alberta (formerly Century
Oilfield Services Inc., Calgary, Alberta)

VS1

7379

April 16, 2011

April 26, 2011

Stepan Company, Northfield, Illinois

ALPHA-STEP LD-450 (formerly ALPHA-STEP LD-450 PJ296)

7412

11-12-2008

July 25, 2011

Stepan Company, Northfield, Illinois

VERSA FOAM PLUS

7414

12-15-2008

July 25, 2011

Süd-Chemie Inc., Louisville, Kentucky

AmoMax ® 10

7483

07/21/2009

May 30, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 474
Performance
Additive

7587

3/5/2009

May 12, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 4142 Fuel
Additive

7598

3/11/2009

July 21, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 4142C Fuel Additive

7599

5/29/2009

July 21, 2011

Rohm and Haas
Canada LP,
West Hill, Ontario

RINSEABLE
PRIMER RP-1

7661

05/19/2009

April 14, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 2585
Performance
Additive

7672

1/20/2010

May 31, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 2581
Performance
Additive

7673

1/20/2010

April 1, 2011

BYK USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut

BYK ®-W 965

7689

06/30/2009

May 30, 2011

BYK USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut

Disperbyk ® 101

7690

06/30/2009

May 30, 2011

BYK USA Inc, Wallingford, Connecticut

BYK-S 750

7691

06/30/2009

May 25, 2011

BWA Water
Additives US, LLC,
Tucker, Georgia

BELCOR 585

7695

April 28th, 2010

July 27, 2011

Trican Well
Service Ltd.,
Calgary, Alberta

ASA-30

7711

July 20, 2009

April 28, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 352
Performance
Additive

7716

3/4/2010

May 12, 2011

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

MERCAPTAN
TERMINATED
POLYMER

7733

March 25, 2011

April 26, 2011

Recochem Inc.,
Milton, Ontario

HYBRID HD
ELC-N 5X SC

7735

05/11/2010

July 29, 2011

Sanjel Corporation, Calgary, Alberta

AI-7

7740

December 1, 2009

July 25, 2011

Sanjel Corporation, Calgary, Alberta

AI-8

7741

December 1, 2009

July 25, 2011

Special Products, Division of Champion Technologies Inc., Houston, Texas

Klay Safe LT2

7744

02/11/2010

May 20, 2011

Champion Technologies Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

Emulsotron ®
X-8234

7756

05/06/2010

July 26, 2011

Mid-continental
Dental Supply Co. Ltd., Headingley, Manitoba
(formerly Headingly, Manitoba)

87555123

7758

October 20, 2009

May 31, 2011

Rohm and Haas
Canada LP,
West Hill, Ontario

PARALOID™
BTA-733 ER Impact Modifier

7759

11/10/2009

July 27, 2011

3M Canada,
London, Ontario

3M™ AUTOMIX™
PANEL BONDING ADHESIVE - PART A

7763

2009/12/03

July 13, 2011

Calfrac Well
Services Ltd.,
Calgary, Alberta

DCP-AC5

7768

March 18, 2010

April 26, 2011

Bio-Lab Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario

BIOGUARD®
SMART SHOCK ®

7778

09/07/2010

June 30, 2011

Bio-Lab Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario

BioGuard Lite

7779

06/28/2010

June 24, 2011

Bio-Lab Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario

SPAGUARD OXIDIZER/ OXYDANT SPA LITE
( formerly SPAGUARD SPA LITE)

7780

06/28/2010

June 24, 2011

Bio-Lab Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario

Guardex WinterGuard Shock

7781

06/28/2010

June 24, 2011

Bio-Lab Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario

Spa Essentials Spa Shock

7782

06/28/2010

June 24, 2011

Bio-Lab Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario

Omni Crystal
Clear Multi-Shock

7783

06/28/2010

June 24, 2011

Bio-Lab Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario

Spa Synergy Clear

7784

06/28/2010

June 24, 2011

Bio-Lab Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario

Synergy Clear

7785

06/28/2010

June 24, 2011

Bio-Lab Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario

AquaChem Shock Plus

7786

06/28/2010

June 24, 2011

Bio-Lab Canada Inc., West Hill, Ontario

BioGuard Winter/
Hiver Shock

7787

06/28/2010

June 24, 2011

Clariant Corporation, Charlotte,
North Carolina

GENAPOL B2

7800

02/26/2010

April 13, 2011

Dow Corning Corporation,
Auburn, Michigan

DOW CORNING ®
Q2-3183A ANTIFOAM

7802

2010/02/18

April 8, 2011

Dow Corning Corporation,
Auburn, Michigan

DOW CORNING ®
65 ADDITIVE

7803

2010/02/18

April 8, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 317T
Performance
Additive

7811

8/5/2010

May 12, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 580
Performance
Additive

7812

2/24/2010

May 31, 2011

Champion Technologies Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

Emulsotron ®
XZ-1677C

7818

03/03/2010

July 26, 2011

Champion Technologies Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

Surfatron®
DN-158

7819

03/03/2010

July 26, 2011

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ Rubber &
Vinyl 80 Spray
Adhesive

7828

2010/03/31

May 12, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 2450
Performance
Additive

7830

3/12/2009

July 21, 2011

Ashland (Hercules Canada)
Canada Corp.,
Mississauga, Ontario

Infinity ® PK2732
(formerly Infinity ® PK2732 Pulp Mill Additive)

7834

8/18/2010

May 27, 2011

Weatherford International Ltd., Houston, Texas

ALPHA 1064

7839

22-March-2010

May 31, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

LUBAD 977

7851

4/22/2010

June 9, 2011

BYK USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut

BYK ®-3155

7853

05/03/2010

July 27, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 6560
Fuel Additive

7855

6/1/2010

June 3, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

LUBAD 1268

7858

5/11/2010

June 3, 2011

Afton Chemical Corporation,
Richmond, Virginia

LUBAD 1603

7861

5/11/2010

May 18, 2011

Dow Corning
Canada Inc.,
Mississauga, Ontario

DOW CORNING ®
D-5077 TOP COAT

7864

2010/11/09

May 20, 2011

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

Lignostab 1198

7870

11.18.2010

May 9, 2011

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

REDICOTE ®
C-320

7878

7/22/2010

May 3, 2011

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

REDICOTE ®
E-11 E

7879

7/22/2010

June 30, 2011

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

REDICOTE ®
E-4868

7880

7/22/2010

June 30, 2011

BWA Water
Additives US, LLC,
Tucker, Georgia

Belclene 800

7881

May 24, 2010

July 28, 2011

BWA Water
Additives US, LLC, Tucker, Georgia

Belclene 810

7882

May 24, 2010

July 28, 2011

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

REDICOTE ®
E-4819-3

7883

7/22/2010

May 19, 2011

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

REDICOTE®
E-4819

7886

7/22/2010

May 19, 2011

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

REDICOTE®
C-3082

7887

6/8/2010

July 21, 2011

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC.,
Chicago, Illinois

REDISET™
WMX-8017A

7890

9/15/2010

April 11, 2011

Sani Marc Inc. /
Wood Wyant Inc., Victoriaville, Quebec

Wave

7895

28/06/2010

April 8, 2011

Sani Marc Inc. /
Wood Wyant Inc., Victoriaville, Quebec

Vert-2-Go Blue Force (formerly Vert-2-Go Toilet Bowl Cleaner)

7897

13/09/2010

April 8, 2011

Sani Marc Inc. /
Wood Wyant Inc., Victoriaville, Quebec

Vert-2-Go Scrub E-Z (formerly Vert-2-Go Nettoyant à salle de bain)

7898

13/09/2010

April 8, 2011

Stepan Company, Northfield, Illinois

STEPANPOL PS3024 (formerly
AGENT 3266-61)

7909

02-22-2011

May 9, 2011

Mead Westvaco Corporation - Specialty Chemicals Division, North Charleston,
South Carolina

INDULIN® SA-L

7912

9/7/2010

May 12, 2011

Mead Westvaco Corporation - Specialty Chemicals Division, North Charleston,
South Carolina

INDULIN® MQK

7913

9/7/2010

May 25, 2011

JFB Hart Coatings Inc., Woodridge, Illinois

GLOSSTEK™
100 - PART B

7923

July 27, 2010

May 5, 2011

JFB Hart Coatings Inc., Woodridge, Illinois

GLOSSTEK™
400 - PART B

7924

July 27, 2010

May 5, 2011

3M Canada
Company,
London, Ontario

3M™ Scotch-Weld™ Acrylic Adhesive
DP-812, Part B

7927

2010/09/09

July 26, 2011

3M Canada
Company,
London, Ontario

3M™ Scotch-Weld™ Acrylic Adhesive
DP-825, Part B

7929

2010/09/09

July 26, 2011

Chevron Oronite Company LLC,
Bellaire, Texas

OFA 77035

7932

October 26, 2010

June 22, 2011

Baker Petrolite Corporation,
Sugar Land, Texas

XERIC™ 7005
HEAVY OIL
DEMULSIFIER

7933

9/20/2010

May 17, 2011

Bayer Inc.,
Toronto, Ontario

DESMOLUX U 200

7934

Jan25/10

May 3, 2011

Integran
Technologies Inc., Toronto, Ontario

nanoPLATE® - A59

7935

25/08/2010

May 16, 2011

Integran
Technologies Inc., Toronto, Ontario

nanoPLATE® - D60

7936

25/08/2010

May 16, 2011

Integran
Technologies Inc., Toronto, Ontario

nanoPLATE® - E61

7937

25/08/2010

May 16, 2011

Integran
Technologies Inc., Toronto, Ontario

Nanovate™- CR2

7938

09/24/2010

May 16, 2011

Baker Petrolite Corporation,
Sugar Land, Texas

CRONOX™ 283ES CORROSION
INHIBITOR

7939

8/23/2010

May 17, 2011

Mead Westvaco Corporation,
North Charleston, South Carolina

INDULIN® 206

7940

3/3/2011

May 20, 2011

Wilsonart
Ⅰnternational Inc., Temple, Texas

Wilsonart® 3000
Series Adhesive

7954

11/05/10

April 12, 2011

E.I. DuPont
Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario

Particlear -
Ingredient A
(formerly Tailings Treatment -
Ingredient A)

7961

16-SEP-2010

May 9, 2011

Momentive Performance Materials,
Pickering, Ontario

Niax® catalyst 
A-300

7966

03/01/2011

May 2, 2011

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park,
New Jersey

EBECRYL® 8414 radiation curing
resins

7968

10/04/2010

April 15, 2011

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield,
New Jersey

438 THINNER

7982

12/7/2010

May 31, 2011

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield,
New Jersey

857 OA FLUX

7987

1/4/2011

June 14, 2011

Cookson Electronics, South Plainfield,
New Jersey

EF-6000 NO
CLEAN FLUX

7991

1/10/2011

May 31, 2011

3M Canada
Company,
London, Ontario

SCOTCHKOTE 327 PATCH, BRUSH, AND SPRAY GRADE LIQUID EPOXY COATING, PART B

8014

2010/10/22

May 2, 2011

Huntsman Corp.,
The Woodlands, Texas

POLYFROTH® W22C

8062

3/24/2011

June 21, 2011

Huntsman Corp.,
The Woodlands, Texas

POLYFROTH® H23

8082

3/24/2011

June 21, 2011

Notes: 1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 10, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7298 to be the chemical identity of five ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of eight ingredients.

2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 20, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7358 to be the chemical identity of six ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of eight ingredients.

3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 20, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7379 to be the chemical identity, concentration, chemical name, common name, generic name, trade name or brand name of a controlled product and information that could be used to identify a supplier of a controlled product of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the trade name of a controlled product and information that could be used to identify a supplier of a controlled product.

4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 20, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7412 to be the chemical identity of eight ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of five ingredients.

5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7587 to be the chemical identity of five ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of eight ingredients.

6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7598 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7599 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on November 21, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7716 to be the chemical identity of five ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of eight ingredients.

9. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on November 21, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7733 to be the chemical identity, concentration, chemical name, common name, generic name, trade name or brand name of a controlled product of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the trade name of a controlled product and information that could be used to identify a supplier of a controlled product.

10. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on November 21, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7758 to be the chemical identity and concentration of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

11. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 13, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7802 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

12. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 13, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7803 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.

13. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 13, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7811 to be the chemical identity of seven ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of eight ingredients.

14. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 10, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7830 to be the chemical identity of five ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of eight ingredients.

15. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 10, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7851 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

16. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 10, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7855 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

17. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 10, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7858 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

18. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7938 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

19. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7954 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

20. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7987 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.

21. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7991 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

22. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8062 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

23. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8082 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.

There were no submissions from affected parties to the screening officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs or label.

Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid. The screening officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations.

Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDS in respect of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7691, 7853, 7878, 7880 and 7940 which were filed, complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 7379, being a claim from an employer with operations in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDS in respect of which the claim was filed complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 7733 being a claim from an employer in the province of Ontario, the screening officer found that the MSDS relating to this claim complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Province of Ontario.

In the case of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7711, 7740 and 7741, being claims from employers in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDSs relating to these claims did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta.

In the case of the following claims, the claimant supplied the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or label amended as necessary within the time frame specified. The screening officer was satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified therein.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER WAS SATISFIED THAT THE CLAIMANT HAD TAKEN THE MEASURES SET OUT IN THE UNDERTAKING

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that has been disclosed on the relevant material safety data sheet or label in compliance with an undertaking.

Registry Number 7298

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of three additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations.

2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 4.94 mL/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 1.25 mL/kg for “alkyl phosphate 1”.

3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 710 mg/kg for “alkyl phosphate 2”.

4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 090 mg/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 2.0 mL/kg for “alkyl phosphonate”.

5. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 612 mg/kg, an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 251 mg/kg and an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 157 ppm for “long-chain alkyl amine”.

Registry Number 7354

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 27, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement that if vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

3. Disclose a product LD50 (oral, rat) value of 1 500 mg/kg and a product LC50 (rat, 4 hours) value of 3.7 mg/L or the following ingredients’ acute lethality values:

“2-Butanone”: inhalation LC50 (rat, 4 hours) value of 33.2 mg/L;

“2-Nitropropane”: inhalation LC50 (rat, 4 hours) value of 1.79 mg/L;

“Phenol”: LD50 (oral, rat) value of 340 mg/kg, LC50 (rat, 4 hours) value of >2.0 mg/L; and

“Phenolic epoxy resin”: LD50 (oral, rat) value of 1 140 mg/kg, inhalation LC50 (rat, 4 hours) value of 0.79 mg/L.

Registry Number 7358

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 27, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations, with as much precision as possible.

Registry Numbers 7412 and 7414

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 6, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information for skin contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that skin should be flushed continuously with water for 20 minutes or until chemical is removed.

2. Disclose an ACGIH STEL value of 1 000 ppm for “ethanol”.

3. Add oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 10.6 g/kg for “ethanol”.

5. Disclose an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 31 600 ppm for “ethanol”.

6. Disclose an oral LD50 value of 1 820 mg/kg for “laureth sulphate”, in an acceptable manner.

7. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 4.7 g/kg for “isopropanol”.

8. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6.29 g/kg for “isopropanol”.

9. Disclose an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 27 000 ppm for “isopropanol”.

10. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has caused damage to the testicles, brain and heart muscle in animals.

11. Disclose that “ethanol” in the controlled product has shown teratogenicity effect in laboratory animals and birth defects in humans.

12. Only applies to Registry Number 7412 — Disclose that “methanol” in the controlled product has shown teratogenicity effects in laboratory animals at maternally non toxic levels.

13. Disclose that “isopropanol” in the controlled product has shown teratogenicity effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic levels.

14. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7483

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 4, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the IARC group 2B classification for “Confidential Metal Oxide”.

Registry Number 7587

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of four additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations.

2. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7598

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 9, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of three additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations.

2. In relation to the first aid information for ingestion and skin contact shown on the MSDS, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

3. Disclose that “long-chain alkenyl acid (I)” has caused skin sensitization in animals.

4. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, female rat) value of 370 mg/kg and an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 300 mg/kg for “alkyl amine”.

5. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 8 400 mg/kg for “solvent naphtha (petroleum), light aromatic”.

Registry Number 7599

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 9, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of three additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.

3. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rat) value of 380 mg/kg and an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 890 ppm for “alkyl amine”.

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2B.

Registry Number 7661

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 10, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous combustion products.

2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) for “modified alkylphenol alkoxylate(s)”.

3. Disclose that dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has caused developmental toxicity effects in animals in the absence of maternal toxicity.

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7672

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 15, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentrations of “long chain alkenyl succinimide” in the controlled product.

Registry Number 7673

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 3, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in bacterial cells, in vitro.

Registry Numbers 7689 and 7690

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 24, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source.

Registry Number 7695

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 25, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations.

2. In relation to the first aid information for skin contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that skin should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.

Registry Number 7711

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 30, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 0.53 g/kg and an LD50 (dermal, male rat) value of 0.45 mL/kg for the ingredient “Glycol Ether EB”.

2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) of 0.69 g/kg for the ingredient “Quaternary Ammonium Compounds”.

3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 8.00 mL/kg and an LC50 (female rat, 4 hours) value of 27 000 ppm for the ingredient “Isopropanol”.

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be corrosive to the eyes and severely irritating to the skin.

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

7. Add oxides of nitrogen and hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.

8. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels. Remove the statement not mutagenic.

Registry Numbers 7740 and 7741

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 17, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

2. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse heart effects.

3. Disclose that acute inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused central nervous system (CNS) depression in laboratory animals.

4. Disclose that acute ingestion and dermal exposure of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused damage to internal organs in laboratory animals.

5. Disclose that the ingredient “fatty acids” in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin sensitization in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7744

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of carbon, nitrogen and hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 7756

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 10, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute inhalation of the ingredient “methanol” in the controlled product may cause adverse central nervous system (CNS) effects.

2. Disclose that acute ingestion of “methanol” in the controlled product has resulted in various adverse central nervous system (CNS) effects, including gastrointestinal symptoms, respiratory impairment, brain damage and death.

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin and eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin and eyes should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes and medical attention be obtained immediately.

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

5. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source.

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has caused developmental toxicity in laboratory animal fetus in the absence of maternal toxicity.

Registry Number 7758

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 29, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product tests positive with and without metabolic activation with S9 for cell mutation in vitro in laboratory animals.

2. Disclose that the controlled product should be stored in a cool, dry and well-ventilated place away from ignition sources.

3. Disclose correct information related to the disposal of oxidizing waste.

Registry Number 7759

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous thermal decomposition products.

Registry Number 7763

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 15, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration range for “Bis (3-aminopropyl) ether of diethylene glycol” (CAS Registry Number 4246-51-9) and “Bis[(dimethylamino) methyl]phenol” (CAS Registry Number 71074-89-0), in an acceptable manner.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give one to two glasses of water to drink.

3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient “inorganic nitrate” in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7768

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin and eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin and eyes should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes.

Registry Number 7778

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 29, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, add that medical attention should be obtained immediately.

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that contaminated clothing, shoes and leather goods should be removed as soon as possible and that medical attention be obtained immediately.

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement that if vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

5. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA of 2 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “aluminum sulfate”.

6. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA of 2 mg/m3 and an ACGIH STEL of 6 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “boron salt”.

7. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA of 0.1 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “sodium persulfate”.

8. Disclose oxides of carbon as hazardous thermal decomposition products.

9. Disclose a lower LD50 (female rat) value of 486 mg/kg for the controlled product.

Registry Number 7780

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D2A, D2B, C and E.

2. Disclose the percent concentration range for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients, “boron salt”, in an acceptable manner.

3. Disclose the specific chemical identity “sodium persulfate (CAS Registry Number 7775-27-1) and “aluminum sulphate” (CAS Registry Number 10043-01-3) with their CAS Registry Number.

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that medical attention should be obtained immediately.

5. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA of 2 mg/m3 for the ingredient disclosed as Trade Secret 011 and the appropriate units for the STEL CA AB OEL of ingredient “boron salt”.

6. Add oxides of carbon, nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Numbers 7779 and 7781–7787

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 22, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

2. Disclose the percent concentration range for ingredients “aluminum sulfate” and “boron salt”, in an acceptable manner.

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that medical attention should be obtained immediately.

4. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA of 2 mg/m3 for the ingredient “aluminum sulfate” and the appropriate units for the STEL CA AB OEL of ingredient “boron salt”.

Registry Number 7800

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 2, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 15 minutes.

2. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rat) value of >1 000 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “fatty alcohol polyglycol ether”.

Registry Number 7802

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 2, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations.

Registry Number 7803

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 2, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations.

Registry Number 7811

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 3, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations.

2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 710 mg/kg for the ingredient “alkyl phosphate II”.

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 7812

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 15, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7818

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 10, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product may cause adverse central nervous system (CNS) effects.

2. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse central nervous system (CNS) effects.

3. In relation to the first aid information for eye and skin contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that eyes and skin should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

5. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire, if they contact an ignition source.

6. Disclose a lower LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg for ingredient “xylene”.

7. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) for the confidential hazardous ingredient “ethoxylated alcohol” in an acceptable manner.

8. Disclose a lower LC50 (vapour, rat, 8 hours) value of 19 000 ppm (equivalent to 66 038 mg/m3, 4 hours) for “isopropanol”.

9. Disclose that chronic exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product may cause damage to hearing organs.

10. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause in vitro mutagenic effects in mammalian cells.

11. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity and postnatal developmental toxicity in laboratory animal fetus, in the absence of maternal toxicity.

12. Disclose that “xylene” interacts synergistically with “n-hexane” to enhance hearing loss in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7819

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 7, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute inhalation and acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product may cause adverse central nervous system (CNS) effects.

2. In relation to the first aid information for eye and skin contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that eyes and skin should be flushed continuously with water for 15 minutes or until chemical is removed.

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

4. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.

5. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire, if they contact an ignition source.

6. Disclose the LD50 value for the confidential hazardous ingredient “aromatic solvent”, in an acceptable manner.

7. Disclose the LC50 value for confidential hazardous ingredient “alcohol solvent”, in an acceptable manner.

8. Disclose the LC50 (vapour, female rat, 6 hours) value of 23.9 mg/L for “Petroleum Naphtha”.

9. Disclose that chronic exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product may cause damage to hearing organs.

10. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in vitro in mammalian cells.

11. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity and postnatal developmental toxicity in laboratory animal fetus, in the absence of maternal toxicity.

12. Disclose that “aromatic solvent” interacts synergistically with “n-hexane” to enhance hearing loss in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7828

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 10, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information for eye and skin contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that eyes and skin should be flushed continuously with water for 20 minutes or until chemical is removed.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 6.97 g/kg for “methyl acetate”.

4. Disclose the LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 164 000 ppm for “dimethyl ether”.

5. Disclose the LC50 (rat, 4 hours) value of 13.9 mg/L for “cyclohexane”.

6. Disclose the LC50 (aerosol, rat, 4 hours) value of 8.5 g/m3 for “hydro treated heavy naphtha (petroleum)”.

7. Disclose that toluene is potentiated by acetylsalicylic acid to produce irreversible auditory damage in laboratory animals.

8. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7830

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 9, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of three additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations.

2. Disclose oxides of nitrogen and sulphur as additional to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

Registry Number 7834

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 20, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7839

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 27, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

2. Add oxides of carbon, nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

3. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire, if they contact an ignition source.

4. Disclose that the controlled product is incompatible with aluminum (mixture is explosive) and magnesium (vigorous exothermic reaction).

5. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 12.25 mL/kg (calculated as 9 690 mg/kg; S.G.=0.791) for “methanol”.

6. Disclose that ingestion of “methanol” has resulted in adverse central nervous system (CNS) effects, shortness of breath, eye effects, prolonged coma and respiratory failure and death due to lethal acidosis in humans.

7. Disclose that inhalation of “methanol” has caused central nervous system (CNS) effects in humans.

8. Disclose that ingestion or inhalation of “methanol” has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in the absence of maternal toxicity.

9. If the WHMIS classifications and pictograms are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B and the D1 pictogram.

Registry Number 7851

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations.

2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 612 mg/kg for “long-chain alkyl amine”.

3. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 251 mg/kg for “long-chain alkyl amine”.

4. Disclose an LC50 (vapour, female rat, 4 hours) value of 157 ppm for “long-chain alkyl amine”.

Registry Number 7855

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 28, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration.

Registry Number 7858

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 26, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of “ethylene glycol”, CAS Registry Number 107-21-1, in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration.

2. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.

3. Disclose an ACGIH exposure limit (ceiling) of 100 mg/m3 for “ethylene glycol”.

4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 100 mg/kg for “zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate”.

5. Disclose that “ethylene glycol” has caused teratogenic and embryotoxic effects in laboratory animals, in the absence of maternal toxicity.

6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7861

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 27, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7864

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 11, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of “talc”, CAS Registry Number 14807-96-6, in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration.

2. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 10 mL/kg for “dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether”.

3. Disclose that ingestion of “N-methylpyrrolidone” has been shown to cause kidney effects in laboratory animals.

Registry Numbers 7870

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 9, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause eye corrosion in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7879

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 15, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add ingestion as a route of entry.

2. Disclose an ACGIH STEL exposure limit of 1 000 ppm for “ethanol”.

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse heart effects in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7881

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 25, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that the controlled product can be corrosive to the eyes and skin.

2. Disclose the HMIRC registry number and information relating to the progress of the claim.

3. Disclose the percent concentration of “organic acid” in the controlled product.

Registry Number 7882

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 25, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that the controlled product can be corrosive to the eyes and skin.

2. Disclose the HMIRC registry number and information relating to the progress of the claim.

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin and eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin and eyes should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes.

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement to instruct casualty to lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Registry Numbers 7883 and 7886

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 20, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7887

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 7, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose ingestion as a route of entry.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement that if vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenicity effects in laboratory animals at maternally non-toxic dose levels.

5. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7890

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration for ingredients “fatty polyamines” and “hydrocarbon oligomer” in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7895

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 11, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the chemical identity for ingredient “sodium (C14-16) olefin sulphonate” in the controlled product, together with the actual concentration or an acceptable range value.

2. Disclose an LD50 (oral) value of 3 800 mg/kg for “sodium (C14-16) olefin sulphonate”.

Registry Number 7897

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 11, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD50 (oral) value of 1.2 g/kg for “alkyl (C9-11) alcohol ethoxylated”.

Registry Number 7898

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 11, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the chemical identity for ingredient “citric acid” in the controlled product, together with the actual concentration or an acceptable range value.

2. Disclose oxides of nitrogen as additional to the list of hazardous decomposition products.

3. Disclose an LD50 (oral) value of 1.2 g/kg for “alkyl (C9-11) alcohol ethoxylated”.

4. Disclose an LD50 (oral) value of 3 000 mg/kg for “citric acid”.

Registry Number 7912

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 18, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7913

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 3, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Numbers 7923 and 7924

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 25, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statement “give two glasses of water for dilution”.

2. Disclose an ACGIH STEL value of 150 ppm (skin) for the confidential hazardous ingredient “dipropylene glycol methyl ether”.

Registry Numbers 7927 and 7929

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 29, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenicity effects in laboratory animals, in the absence of maternal toxicity.

2. Disclose an additional ingredient, “ethylene glycol”, in the controlled product and its CAS Registry Number (107-21-1) together with the actual concentration or an acceptable range value.

3. In relation to the first aid information for eye and skin contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that eyes and skin should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement that if vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

5. Add oxides of sulfur and hydrogen chlorine gas to the list of hazardous combustion products.

6. Advise that the metal container should be grounded during a transfer of a large amount of flammable liquids.

7. Disclose an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 7 093 ppm for “methyl methacrylate”, an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 7.1 mg/L for “methacrylic acid” and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 134 mg/kg for “cumene hydroperoxide”.

8. Disclose that “methyl methacrylate” in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro.

9. Disclose that “cumene hydroperoxide” in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro.

10. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.

Registry Number 7932

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 4, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an ACGIH TWA value of 100 ppm (skin) for confidential hazardous ingredient “glycol ether”.

2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value for confidential hazardous ingredient “glycol ether”, in an acceptable manner.

Registry Number 7933

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 15, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose ingestion as a route of exposure.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

Registry Number 7934

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 31, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7935

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 22, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information for skin contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that skin should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement that if vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statement “give one or two glasses of water”.

4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value for confidential hazardous ingredient “inorganic acid”, with as much precision as possible.

Registry Number 7936

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 22, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information for skin contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that skin should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement that if vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statement “give one or two glasses of water”.

4. Disclose a vapour density value of 3.38 (air=1), an evaporation rate negligible and coefficient of water/oil distribution value of Log P (oct)= –0.77 for the controlled product.

Registry Number 7937

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 22, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information for skin contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that skin should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement that if vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statement “give one or two glasses of water”.

4. Disclose a vapour pressure value of 28.0 kPa (201 mm Hg) at 20°C, a pH value of <0.1 and a coefficient of water/oil distribution value of Log P (oct)=0.3 for the controlled product.

Registry Number 7938

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 22, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information for skin contact already disclosed on the MSDS, add a statement to the effect that skin should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement that if vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, delete the statement “give one or two glasses of water”.

Registry Number 7939

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 15, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose ingestion as a route of exposure.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement that if vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.

4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 730 mg/kg for “formic acid”.

5. Disclose that exposure to high concentrations of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7954

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 25, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7961

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7966

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 18, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the specific gravity value of 1.108 at 25°C of the controlled product.

Registry Number 7968

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 16, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed.

Registry Number 7982

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 29, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and developmental effects in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.

2. Disclose a lower LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6 290 mg/kg for ingredient “isopropyl alcohol”.

Registry Number 7987

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 23, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and developmental effects in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.

2. Disclose a lower LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6 290 mg/kg for ingredient “isopropanol”.

3. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 1 018 mg/kg for confidential hazardous ingredient “amine”.

Registry Number 7991

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 29, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and developmental effects in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.

2. Disclose a lower LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6 290 mg/kg for ingredient “isopropanol”.

Registry Number 8014

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 2, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels.

Registry Number 8062

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with water for at least 15 minutes.

2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value for ingredient “methyl isobutyl carbinol”, with as much precision as possible.

Registry Number 8082

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed with water for at least 15 minutes.

In the case of the following claims, either the claimant did not supply the screening officer with a signed undertaking or the screening officer was not satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified in it. Pursuant to subsection 17.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the screening officer ordered the claimant to comply with the requirements of the relevant legislation within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER ORDERED THE CLAIMANT TO COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that the screening officer ordered to be disclosed on a material safety data sheet reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 7716

Date of order: August 5, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations.

2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 612 mg/kg, an LD50 (dermal, rat) value of 251 mg/kg, and an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 157 ppm for ingredient “long-chain alkyl amine” and an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 710 mg/kg for ingredient “alkyl phosphate 2”.

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Registry Number 7735

Date of order: September 9, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that the controlled product can be corrosive to the eyes and skin.

2. Remove the conflicting statement that no ingredients in the controlled product are hazardous.

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.

4. Disclose the provincial exposure values for “ethylene glycol” of (BC, C) 100 mg/m3, (BC, C) 50 ppm, (QC, VECD/ Ceiling) 50 ppm, and (QC, VECD/Ceiling) 127 mg/m3.

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in vitro.

6. If the WHMIS classifications or pictograms are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and E.

Note: The following claim was cancelled after the issuance of the decisions and thus neither was a signed undertaking provided nor was an order issued. The screening officer has identified the following instances of non-compliance with the requirements of the relevant legislation.

Registry Number 7909

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the chemical identity for confidential hazardous ingredient “aromatic ester” in the controlled product, together with the actual concentration, with as much precision as possible.

2. Disclose an AIHA WEEL–TWA value of 10 mg/m3 for ingredient “diethylene glycol”.

3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 13 331 mg/kg for “diethylene glycol”.

4. If the WHMIS classifications or pictograms are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.

Pursuant to paragraphs 18(1)(a) and 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the screening officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Pursuant to subsection 24(3) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended labels must be available in both official languages.

Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a screening officer. It also affords the opportunity to an affected party to appeal an undertaking. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, to the Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, 613-998-2363 (telephone).

GERHARD BRUINS
Acting Director, Screening Division

[5-1-o]

PARKS CANADA AGENCY

SPECIES AT RISK ACT

Description of critical habitat of Dwarf Hackberry in Point Pelee National Park of Canada

Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia) is a species listed on Schedule 1 to the Species at Risk Act as threatened. It is a small, deciduous tree that occurs within specific habitat types in the mainland portion of Point Pelee National Park of Canada. Critical habitat for Dwarf Hackberry is identified within the Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia) in Canada.

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to subsection 58(2) of the Species at Risk Act, critical habitat of Dwarf Hackberry in the mainland portion of Point Pelee National Park of Canada (Figure 1), as identified on the National Topographic System (NTS) map 40G/15 (Edition 7, printed in 2001), is described as the boundaries of the occupied Red Cedar Treed Sand Dune and Hoptree Shrub Sand Dune Ecological Land Classification (ELC) vegetation types adjacent to the shores of Lake Erie. Within the geographic boundary of these ELC vegetation types (see Figure 1), critical habitat is located where the following biophysical attributes occur: open to moderately vegetated areas, often with a relatively high level of natural disturbance or harsh environmental conditions, including dry, sandy, well-drained sites with open, early successional habitats. These attributes occur near the shores of Lake Erie along the leading edge of woody, shoreline vegetation adjacent to woodland or forest and in adjacent shrub and/or treed sand dune, shrub shoreline, and deciduous thicket communities at Point Pelee National Park of Canada.

Existing anthropogenic features are excluded from critical habitat. These features include, but are not limited to, existing infrastructure (e.g. roads, trails, parking lots, utility corridors, and buildings), existing cultivated areas (e.g. agricultural fields), or unnatural vegetation types (e.g. grassed areas and septic beds).

Critical habitat parcel numbers are based on the unique Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) species identification number for Dwarf Hackberry (247) and the parcel number. Further details regarding Dwarf Hackberry critical habitat can be found on the Species at Risk Public Registry Web site.

Figure 1

Map - Detailed information can be found in the surrounding text

Location and extent of critical habitat parcel No. 247_3 for Dwarf Hackberry. Critical habitat does not include existing infrastructure, existing cultivated areas, unnatural vegetation types, or areas in or adjacent to anthropogenic features where the presence of Dwarf Hackberry is opportunistically related to the existence of these features. Please refer to the Species at Risk Public Registry Web site for more details on Dwarf Hackberry critical habitat.

January 18, 2012

GEOFFREY HANCOCK
Field Unit Superintendent
Southwestern Ontario Field Unit

[5-1-o]

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ACT

Permission granted

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to section 116 of the Public Service Employment Act, hereby gives notice that it has granted permission, pursuant to subsection 115(2) of the said Act, to Scott McConaghy, Analyst, Administrative Systems and Data Bases (CS-02), Shared Services Office, Atlantic Region, Natural Resources Canada, Fredericton, New Brunswick, to be a candidate, before and during the election period, for the position of Councillor and Deputy Mayor for the City of Fredericton, New Brunswick, in a municipal election to be held on May 14, 2012.

January 19, 2012

KATHY NAKAMURA
Director General
Political Activities Directorate

[5-1-o]