ARCHIVED — Vol. 145, No. 42 — October 15, 2011

COMMISSIONS

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of charities

Following a request from the charities listed below to have their status as a charity revoked, the following notice of intention to revoke was sent:

“Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraph 168(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the charities listed below and that by virtue of paragraph 168(2)(a) thereof, the revocation of the registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette.”

Business Number	Name/Address
106803604RR0001	BOWNESS BAPTIST CHURCH, CALGARY, ALTA.
107951618RR0463	THE SALVATION ARMY TORONTO JARVIS STREET HARBOUR LIGHT CENTRE, TORONTO, ONT.
108084658RR0052	ST. JOHN THE DIVINE NEPEAN, NEPEAN, ONT.
118785971RR0001	AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL GROUP 137, NIAGARA-ON-THE-LAKE, ONT.
118817006RR0001	BRANTFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL BENEVOLENT FUND, BRANTFORD, ONT.
118835933RR0001	RUSSIAN GOSPEL MINISTRIES OF CANADA, ST. THOMAS, ONT.
118888981RR0001	DUFF COMMUNITY HERITAGE MUSEUM CORPORATION, DUFF, SASK.
118890946RR0001	EAST FERRY UNITED BAPTIST CHURCH, EAST FERRY, N.S.
118932136RR0001	FREE WILL BAPTIST CHURCH OF WILMOT, WILMOT, N.B.
118959030RR0001	HOLDEN LUTHERAN CHURCH, HOLDEN, ALTA.
118989326RR0001	LA COOPÉRATIVE DU CLUB D’ÂGE D’OR DE ST-LOUIS LIMITÉE, SAINT-LOUIS-DE-KENT (N.-B.)
119040707RR0001	MILDRED M. MAHONEY SILVER JUBILEE DOLLS’ HOUSE FOUNDATION, FORT ERIE, ONT.
119062727RR0001	NORWICH-GORE UNITED CHURCH, NORWICH, ONT.
119099000RR0001	PRESBYTERIAN WOMEN’S MISSIONARY SOCIETY, WESTERN DIVISION, WOMEN OF MAPLEWOOD AFFILI., MAPLEWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, CHÂTEAUGUAY, QUE.
119109817RR0022	ST. PATRICK’S CHURCH, WINDSOR, ONT.
119210672RR0001	TESSIER & DISTRICT DONOR’S CHOICE COMBINED APPEAL, TESSIER, SASK.
119214393RR0001	THEATRE RESOURCE CENTRE (OTTAWA), TORONTO, ONT.
119223758RR0435	THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS-ST. JOVITE BRANCH, MONT-TREMBLANT, QUE.
119264026RR0001	THREE RIVERS PASTORAL CHARGE, BEAR RIVER, N.S.
119302206RR0001	WOMANS HOME & FOREIGN MISSION SOCIETY OF ADVENT CHRISTIAN CHURCH, SMITH’S COVE, N.S.
119309367RR0001	ZION UNITED CHURCH, THAMESFORD, ONT.
128831898RR0001	RÉSIDENCE DOMAINE DE LA PRÉSENTATION, LA BAIE (QC)
129892659RR0022	COMMUNITY OF CHRIST BRANTFORD CONGREGATION, BRANTFORD, ONT.
129892659RR0032	COMMUNITY OF CHRIST SUDBURY CONGREGATION, SUDBURY, ONT.
133300426RR0001	ST. ANDREW’S PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, OXFORD MILLS, ONT.
138904768RR0001	CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF TRANSPLANTATION L’ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DE LA TRANSPLANTATION, FORT SASKATCHEWAN, ALTA.
141091900RR0001	ST. THOMAS CHURCH, KIRKFIELD, ONT.
141124016RR0001	ORGANISME DE PRÉVENTION TOXICOMANIE L’OPTION BROME-MISSISQUOI, FARNHAM (QC)
813659141RR0001	THE LEFEBVRE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, CALGARY, ALTA.
834280323RR0001	PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLY OF LLOYDMINSTER, LLOYDMINSTER, ALTA.
847716073RR0001	MUSLIMSERV INC., BRAMPTON, ONT.
850895459RR0001	OPEN HOUSE FREE METHODIST CHURCH, STRATFORD, ONT.
855233052RR0001	RAYMORE COMMUNITY DAYCARE INC., RAYMORE, SASK.
856865639RR0001	THE VANESSA ANIMAL AID FUND, LANGLEY, B.C.
863955712RR0001	VICTORIA CENTRE FOR NON PROFIT MANAGEMENT, VANCOUVER, B.C.
864829619RR0001	THE RALPH KLEIN FOUNDATION, EDMONTON, ALTA.
865168199RR0001	C.A.S.E.Y. (COMMUNITY AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF YOUTH), KELOWNA, B.C.
869101196RR0001	THE SANDERLING FOUNDATION, TORONTO, ONT.
870176831RR0001	THE POLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE RESEARCH SOCIETY OF CANADA, ETOBICOKE, ONT.
870251865RR0001	KHIDMA FOUNDATION, VANCOUVER, B.C.
871651147RR0001	WHITCHURCH HIGHLANDS SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL, STOUFFVILLE, ONT.
871780367RR0001	NORTEC PARENTS’ GROUP, COOKSTOWN, ONT.
882893340RR0001	KUANG LUN BUDDHISM SOCIETY, ABBOTSFORD, B.C.
886042993RR0001	KAMLOOPS COMMUNITY Y FOUNDATION, KAMLOOPS, B.C.
888746260RR0001	WEST DOVER UNITED BAPTIST CHURCH, WEST DOVER, N.S.
888748746RR0001	GOOD BEARS OF THE WORLD CANADA LIMESTONE TEDDIES, KINGSTON, ONT.
889217345RR0001	CENTRAL ALBERTA ASSOCIATION OF FRIENDS OF CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, RED DEER, ALTA.
890120322RR0001	BUREAU CENTRAL DES BÉNÉVOLES DE LA RÉGION DE HAWKESBURY, HAWKESBURY (ONT.)
890216641RR0001	FONDATION EXPANSION - FEMMES DE QUÉBEC, CHARLESBOURG (QC)
890262595RR0001	CHRIST FOR INDIA CHARITABLE ASSOCIATION, VANCOUVER, B.C.
890390875RR0001	DUART PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, DUART, ONT.
890472194RR0001	INTERNATIONAL ORDER OF ST. LUKE THE PHYSICIAN KITCHENER-WATERLOO CHAPTER, WATERLOO, ONT.
891122145RR0001	GLOBAL OCEANS RESEARCH GROUP, TORONTO, ONT.
891168544RR0001	KINGSTON FAMILY YMCA FUND, KINGSTON, ONT.
891313447RR0001	SPRINGHILL ROTARY ASSISTANCE FUND, SPRINGHILL, N.S.
891460404RR0001	VESTIAIRE ET ENTRAIDE DE LA PAROISSE SAINT-DENIS, MONTRÉAL (QC)
891583973RR0001	NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH OF PRAISE, CORNER BROOK, N.L.
891717043RR0001	L’ASSOCIATION DES AUXILIAIRES BÉNÉVOLES DU FOYER DE VALCOURT INC., VALCOURT (QC)
893192773RR0001	MON KEANG CHINESE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION, VANCOUVER, B.C.
895462992RR0001	WORKING TOGETHER MINISTRIES, FRANKFORD, ONT.
895532042RR0001	FOREST GROVE CARE CENTRE FOUNDATION, CALGARY, ALTA.
895930972RR0001	EXECUTIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC., REGINA, SASK.

CATHY HAWARA
Director General
Charities Directorate

[42-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The Commission posts on its Web site the decisions, notices of consultation and regulatory policies that it publishes, as well as information bulletins and orders. On April 1, 2011, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure came into force. As indicated in Part 1 of these Rules, some broadcasting applications are posted directly on the Commission’s Web site, www.crtc.gc.ca, under “Part 1 Applications.”

To be up to date on all ongoing proceedings, it is important to regularly consult “Today’s Releases” on the Commission’s Web site, which includes daily updates to notices of consultation that have been published and ongoing proceedings, as well as a link to Part 1 applications.

The following documents are abridged versions of the Commission’s original documents. The original documents contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including the locations and addresses where the complete files for the proceeding may be examined. These documents are posted on the Commission’s Web site and may also be examined at the Commission’s offices and public examination rooms. Furthermore, all documents relating to a proceeding, including the notices and applications, are posted on the Commission’s Web site under “Public Proceedings.”

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PART 1 APPLICATION

The following application was posted on the Commission’s Web site between September 30 and October 5, 2011:

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Swift Current, Saskatchewan
2011-1311-7
Amendment to the technical parameters of CBK-FM-4
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: November 2, 2011

[42-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

2011-637 October 5, 2011

Telelatino Network Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Application for a broadcasting licence to operate All Spanish Children’s Television, a national, niche third-language ethnic specialty Category B service.

2011-638 October 5, 2011

Telelatino Network Inc.
Across Canada

Approved — Application for a broadcasting licence to operate All Italian Children’s Television, a national, niche third-language ethnic specialty Category B service.

2011-639 October 6, 2011

TELUS Communications Company
Across Canada

Approved — Addition of Gone Viral TV to the list of non-Canadian programming services authorized for distribution.

2011-640 October 6, 2011

Pritchard Broadcasting Inc.
Saint John, New Brunswick

Denied — Application to amend the broadcasting licence for the low-power, English-language specialty radio station CJRP-FM Saint John.

2011-641 October 6, 2011

Télé Inter-Rives ltée
Rivière-du-Loup, Quebec

Approved — Application to change the technical parameters of the digital rebroadcasting transmitter CIMT-DT-6 Rivière-du-Loup.

2011-642 October 6, 2011

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Windsor, Ontario

Approved — Application to change the technical parameters of the English-language digital television programming undertaking CBET-DT Windsor.

[42-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions, undertakings and orders on claims for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decisions of the screening officer, respecting each claim for exemption and the relevant material safety data sheet (MSDS) and (where applicable) the label, listed below.

Claimant	Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS)	Registry Number	MSDS Preparation Date (As shown on the MSDS)	Date of Decision
LANXESS Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania	VULKACIT CZ/EG-C	7302	08/14/2009	March 16, 2011
LANXESS Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania	VULKACIT DZ/EG-C	7303	05/14/2008	January 6, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	TecGARD 260A	7325	8/18/2009	January 25, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 5724 Performance Additive	7332	5/30/2008	January 5, 2011
Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey formerly West Paterson, New Jersey	CYCOM® 799 Structural Resin	7342	06/11/2008	March 9, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 355 Performance Additive	7351	9/16/2008	March 15, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 511T Performance Additive	7357	7/7/2008	January 6, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	X 15742	7359	7/7/2008	April 16, 2011
Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc., Columbus, Ohio formerly Hexion Specialty Chemical Inc.	EPIKURE™ Curing Agent MGS RIMH 134	7361	25-NOV-2008	January 4, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 1811 Performance Additive	7368	7/7/2008	March 31, 2011
BWA Water Additive, Hamilton, Ontario formerly BWA Water Additives US, LLC	Flocon 260 formerly FLOCON 260	7398	02/04/2009	March 31, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 1154 Performance Additive	7405	9/11/2008	February 24, 2011
Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey formerly West Paterson, New Jersey	CYCOM® E-293FC/ Aluminum Wire Mesh Prepreg	7424	09/19/2008	February 23, 2011
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	CRO9136 CORROSION INHIBITOR	7425	12/18/2009	January 10, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 1229 Performance Additive	7428	2/1/2010	March 17, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 2545 Performance Additive	7429	9/22/2008	March 31, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 350 Performance Additive	7456	10/8/2009	February 24, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 385 Performance Additive	7457	3/1/2010	February 24, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 543 Performance Additive	7460	2/18/2010	March 31, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 5777D Performance Additive	7461	9/30/2009	February 15, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 5402 Fuel Additive	7462	9-March-2010	February 15, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 6403 Fuel Additive	7463	9-March-2010	February 15, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 5727 Performance Additive	7476	10/27/2008	February 8, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 8706 UTTO Performance Additive	7477	10/27/2008	March 8, 2011
Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	Slurriable Crosslink Activator J465	7486	10 November 2008 10 Novembre 2008	February 11, 2011
Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	VDA J557	7488	10 November 2008 10 Novembre 2008	January 6, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 594 Performance Additive	7497	24 November 2008	February 15, 2011
Evonik Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	808-1572 COLORTREND® I BROWN OXIDE	7503	04/28/2010	February 18, 2011
Evonik Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	808-1810 COLORTREND® C YELLOW OXIDE	7504	09/15/2010	February 18, 2011
Evonik Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	808-2009 COLORTREND® L RAW UMBER	7505	06/09/2010	February 18, 2011
Evonik Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	808-2551 COLORTREND® AXX ORGANIC YELLOW	7507	04/28/2010	February 18, 2011
Evonik Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	808-5511 COLORTREND® D PHTHALO GREEN	7508	06/09/2010	February 18, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 6579C Fuel Additive	7512	1/08/2009	March 11, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 510 Performance Additive	7537	12/7/2009	March 29, 2011
Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio	LUBRIZOL® 560H	7551	25 February 2011	January 17, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 8703G Performance Additive	7554	1/14/2009	March 16, 2011
Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey formerly West Paterson, New Jersey	AERO® 5100 Promoter	7556	01/26/2009	February 28, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 1255 Performance Additive	7564	2/2/2009	March 17, 2011
BYK USA Inc, Wallingford, Connecticut	Disperbyk-111	7569	02/06/2009	January 20, 2011
BYK- Chemie USA Inc, Wallingford, Connecticut	BYKETOL -WS	7571	02/06/2009	January 24, 2011
Hilti (Canada) Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario formerly Hilti (Canada) Limited	HIT-ICE	7576	08/18/09	March 24, 2011
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, Pennsylvania formerly Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.	TOMAMINE® EMULSIFIER 300 SURFACTANT	7578	04/08/2009	March 9, 2011 l
Groupe Kemplus, Inc., St-Laurent, Québec	KP-1802/Gel	7583	01/09/2009	March 14, 2011
Groupe Kemplus, Inc., St-Laurent, Québec	KP-1802	7584	01/09/2009	March 14, 2011
Groupe Kemplus, Inc., St-Laurent, Québec	KP-2702	7585	01/09/2009	March 14, 2011
Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc., Columbus, Ohio formerly Hexion Specialty Chemical Inc.	EPIKURE™ 3378 Curing Agent	7588	08-DEC-2009	January 4, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 6579 Fuel Additive	7600	2/27/2009	March 11, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	NEMO 1118	7601	2/27/2009	March 11, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	NEMO 1120	7602	2/27/2009	March 8, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	BioTEC 9881 Fuel Additive	7603	3/9/2010	February 25, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	NEMO 1120T	7604	3/5/2009	March 11, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 6579T Fuel Additive	7605	1/21/2010	March 11, 2011
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	TOLAD® 9022M ADDITIVE	7611	4/14/2009	January 7, 2011
Chemtura Corporation, West Lafayette, Indiana formerly Middlebury, Connecticut	MM SYNCOM 10	7626	04/03/2009	February 21, 2011
Chemtura Corporation, West Lafayette, Indiana formerly Middlebury, Connecticut	ULTREX LOW TEMP 32 HYDRAULIC OIL	7627	04/03/2009	February 21, 2011
Rohm and Haas Canada LP, West Hill, Ontario	PARALOID KM-X1004 PRO Impact Modifier	7662	09/24/2009	January 24, 2011
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	BPR 22650 EMULSIFIER	7670	11/21/2009	January 12, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	BioTEC E85 Fuel Additive	7671	26-May-2009	February 15, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 371 Performance Additive	7674	1/20/2010	March 8, 2011
Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario	NALCO ® EC7015A	7678	2010/03/31	March 9, 2011
Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	High-Temperature Corrosion Inhibitor A270	7681	13 June 2009	February 11, 2011
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Bellaire, Texas	LUBAD 1111 formerly OLOA 4994S	7684	June 22, 2009	January 11, 2011
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	SCOTCHGARD (TM) EXTRACTION CLEANER (CONCENTRATE)	7685	2009/06/26	March 8, 2011
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M (TM) HEAVY DUTY MULTI-SURFACE CLEANER Concentrate (Twist ‘n Fill (TM) Product No. 2)	7688	2009/06/26	February 28, 2011
BYK- Chemie USA Inc, Wallingford, Connecticut	Disperplast-1150	7692	06/20/2007	January 24, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 6567 Fuel Additive	7693	7/15/2009	March 11, 2011
Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey formerly West Paterson, New Jersey	FM® 8130 Black Molding Compound	7697	07/16/2009	January 11, 2011
Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey formerly West Paterson, New Jersey	FM® 8130- E Black Molding Compound	7698	07/16/2009	January 11, 2011
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	SURECLEAN™ 4233R1 CLEANER formerly SURECLEANO 4233R1 CLEANER	7712	3/9/2010	March 30, 2011
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	TOLAD™ 245 ADDITIVE	7720	3/9/2010	January 13, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 6109E Performance Additive	7721	9/15/2009	March 29, 2011
Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	EZEFLO F110 Surfactant	7730	01 September 2009	February 8, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC® 8703 Performance Additive	7745	10/6/2009	February 25, 2011
Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio	LUBRIZOL® 5160	7747	10 February 2010	January 11, 2011
Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario	VERSAMID PUR 2011	7750	10/19/2009	January 24, 2011
Schlumberger Canada Limited, Calgary, Alberta	Dispersing Agent U74	7752	13 October 2009	February 8, 2011
Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey formerly West Paterson, New Jersey	PC-1844® Defoamer	7753	07/20/2010	January 17, 2011
Suncor Energy Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	SENTRON™ 541 C	7754	28 October 2009	February 9, 2011
Rhodia Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario	AGRHOSPEC HT 2009	7770	01/12/2010	January 24, 2011
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M (TM) Scotch-Weld(TM) Epoxy Adhesive DP920, Off-White, Part B	7771	2010/03/31	March 8, 2011
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M (TM) Scotch-Weld(TM) Epoxy Adhesive 920, Off-White, Part B	7772	2010/03/31	March 8, 2011
Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey formerly West Paterson, New Jersey	EBECRYL® 8405 radiation curing resins	7773	01/06/2010	January 17, 2011
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M(TM) PRIMER 94	7777	2010/01/21	March 16, 2011
Dow Corning Canada, Mississauga, Ontario	DOW CORNING ® 3-1953 CONFORMAL COATING	7790	2010/03/08	January 18, 2011
ARC Resins Corporation (TEMBEC), Longueuil, Quebec	AC-3705	7794	22-Apr-10	March 24, 2011
Evonik Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	844-0353 CHROMACHEM®BON RED	7796	02/03/2010	January 27, 2011
Evonik Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	844-0550 CHROMA-CHEM®MONO AZO RED	7797	02/03/2010	January 27, 2011
Evonik Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	870-0018 COLORTREND® TITANIUM WHITE	7798	02/03/2010	January 27, 2011
Ashland Canada Corp., Mississauga, Ontario	Infinity DR2733 formerly INFINITY®DR2733 PULP MILL ADDITIVE	7807	5/19/2010	March 31, 2011
Charles Tennant & Company (Canada) Limited, Weston, Ontario	FLEX 20	7821	Mar02/10	January 24, 2011
Charles Tennant & Company (Canada) Limited, Weston, Ontario	FLEX 41	7822	Mar02/10	January 24, 2011
Charles Tennant & Company (Canada) Limited, Weston, Ontario	FLEX 31	7823	Mar02/10	January 24, 2011
Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio	LUBRIZOL® 5125	7829	03 March 2010	January 21, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	LUBAD 1537	7835	3/17/2010	March 29, 2011
Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey	AERO®MAXGOLD^TM900 Promoter	7842	04/08/2010	March 9, 2011
Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey	AERO® MX-980 Promoter	7843	04/08/2010	March 9, 2011
Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario	NALCO® EC6574A	7844	2010/04/05	February 16, 2011
Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio	CARBOPOL® ULTREZ 20 POLYMER	7845	07 April 2010	January 5, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 6562 Fuel Additive	7854	6/1/2010	March 16, 2011
Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia	HiTEC 052 Performance Additive	7859	5/20/2010	March 31, 2011
Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario	NALCO® EC1021W	7863	2010/07/28	February 16, 2011
Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario	NALCO® EC1474B	7872	2010/05/21	March 21, 2011
Stepan Company, Northfield, Illinois	TOXIMUL 8363	7873	06-04-2010	January 7, 2011
Cognis Canada Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario	HYDROPALAT 100	7874	05/19/2010	February 9, 2011
Evonik Degussa Canada Inc., Brampton, Ontario	808-8850 COLORTREND® VIOLET TONER	7875	06/14/2010	February 23, 2011
Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio	CARBOPOL® ULTREZ 21 POLYMER	7876	04 June 2010	January 5, 2011
Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio	CARBOPOL® ULTREZ EZ-3 POLYMER	7877	14 June 2010	January 5, 2011
Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC., Chicago, Illinois	REDICOTE® 22805	7891	9/15/2010	March 11, 2011
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	TOLAD™ 9547 ADDITIVE	7892	6/10/2010	February 23, 2011
Arkema Canada Inc., Burlington, Ontario	SPS 10LS	7893	06/10/10	January 11, 2011
GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario	SPEC-AID 8Q123	7900	14-JUN-2010	February 15, 2011
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	MILESTONE™ 395 ADDITIVE	7901	8/13/2010	January 18, 2011
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	MILESTONE™ 381 ADDITIVE	7902	6/14/2010	January 27, 2011
E.I. DuPont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario	DuPont^TMPlate Washout Solution Cyrel® Cylosol Component A formerly DuPont(TM) Plate Washout Solution Cyrel (R) Component A	7903	June 17th, 2010	March 1, 2011
E.I. DuPont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario	DuPont™ Plate Washout Solution Cyrel® Cylosol Component B formerly DuPont(TM) Plate Washout Solution Cyrel (R) Component B	7904	June 17th, 2010	March 31, 2011
Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas	CRO2032U CORROSION INHIBITOR	7908	6/29/2010	February 23, 2011
Mead Westvaco Corporation, North Charleston, South Carolina	INDULIN® 201	7910	9/7/2010	January 11, 2011
Mead Westvaco Corporation, North Charleston, South Carolina	MEADWESTVACO® QPR-SQe	7911	9/7/2010	January 11, 2011
Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio	LUBRIZOL® PV1125	7918	20 November 2010	March 4, 20111
Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio	ANGLAMOL®99	7919	19 November 2010	February 10, 2011
Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey	AEROSOL® EF-800 Surfactant	7921	07/28/2010	January 25, 2011
Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey	AEROSOL® EF-810 Surfactant	7922	07/28/2010	January 21, 2011 1
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M (TM) Scotch-Weld(TM) Acrylic Adhesive DP-812, Part A	7926	2010/09/09	March 16, 2011
3M Canada Company, London, Ontario	3M (TM) Scotch-Weld(TM) Acrylic Adhesive DP-825, Part A	7928	2010/09/09	March 16, 2011
Buckeye International Inc., Maryland Heights, Missouri	BUCKEYE BLUE	7949	November 10, 2010	March 11, 2011
Arr-Maz Custom Chemicals, Mulberry, Florida	AD-here® LOF 6500 Canada formerly AD-here LOF 65-00	7950	10/11/2010	March 11, 2011
Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey	EBECRYL® LEO 10553 radiation curing resin	7952	09/13/2010	March 11, 2011
GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario	GENGARD GN8020	7973	04-OCT-2010	March 11, 2011
GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario	GENGARD GN8021	7974	04-OCT-2010	March 11, 2011
GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario	GENGARD GN8220	7975	04-OCT-2010	March 31, 2011
GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario	GENGARD GN8221	7976	04-OCT-2010	March 31, 2011
GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario	GENGARD GN8222	7977	04-OCT-2010	March 11, 2011
GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario	GENGARD GN8224	7978	04-OCT-2010	March 31, 2011
GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario	GENGARD GN8225	7979	04-OCT-2010	March 31, 2011
GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario	GENGARD GN8240	7980	04-OCT-2010	March 11, 2011

Notes:

The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 20, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7351 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of five ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 20, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7359 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 20, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7368 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of six ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 20, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7398 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 20, 2008, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7405 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7457 to be the chemical identity of six ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of seven ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7460 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of six ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7477 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of five ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7486 to be “Information that could be used to identify the supplier of a controlled product.” The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7512 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on January 17, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7537 to be the chemical identity of six ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of eight ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7554 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7583 to be the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7600 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7601 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 28, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7602 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 18, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7662 to be the chemical identity of five ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 18, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7681 to be “Information that could be used to identify the supplier of a controlled product.” The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on November 21, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7745 to be the chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on November 21, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7747 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on November 21, 2009, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7754 to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 13, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7829 to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 10, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7835 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 10, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7843 to be the chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of six ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 10, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7854 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 10, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7873 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 10, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7891 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the claimant as “Lubrizol Corporation,” of the claim bearing Registry Number 7918 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is for “Lubrizol Corporation,” for the chemical identity of three ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7921 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7974 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7975 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on October 30, 2010, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 7976 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.

There were no submissions from affected parties to the screening officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs or label.

Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid. The screening officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations. Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDS in respect of which the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7476, 7503, 7504, 7505, 7507, 7569, 7747, 7753, 7796, 7797, 7798, 7829, 7845, 7876, 7877, 7893, 7900, 7901, 7911, 7919, and 7949 were filed, complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In the case of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 7486, 7488, 7681, 7730, and 7752 being claims from an employer in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDSs relating to these claims did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta.

In all cases where the material safety data sheet or the label was determined not to be in compliance with the relevant legislation, the screening officer offered the claimant the possibility of entering into an undertaking whereby the claimant would voluntarily make the changes necessary to bring the MSDS or the label into compliance. Pursuant to subsection 16.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the claimant was given 30 days to provide the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or the label amended as necessary.

In the case of the following claims, the claimant supplied the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or label amended as necessary within the time frame specified. The screening officer was satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified therein.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER WAS SATISFIED THAT THE CLAIMANT HAD TAKEN THE MEASURES SET OUT IN THE UNDERTAKING

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that has been disclosed on the relevant material safety data sheet or label in compliance with an undertaking.

Registry Number 7302

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 29, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals;

2. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A;

Registry Number 7303

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 7, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7325

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 23, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Clearly identify the numerical range 30-60 as being range values for the concentration of “sodium long chain alkaryl sulfonate”;

2. Add oxides of sulfur to the list of hazardous combustion products;

Registry Number 7332

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 3, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7342

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 11, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Clarify that the ACGIH TWA Exposure Limit Value of 1 000 ppm shown on the MSDS for the hazardous ingredient ethanol is actually a “STEL” value;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as a confirmed animal carcinogen with unknown relevance to humans (A3) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH);

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 340 mg/kg for “phenol”;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A and D2B;

Registry Number 7351

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 18, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of “alkoxylated long chain alkanol borate” in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, female rat) value of 612 mg/kg, an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 251 mg/kg and an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 157 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient “long chain alkyl amine”;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4 800 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 1 210 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkyl phosphate #1”;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2 710 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkyl phosphate #2”;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3.2 g/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 2.0 mL/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkyl phosphonate”;

6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B;

Registry Number 7357

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 3, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7359

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 18, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products;

Registry Number 7368

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of “polyolefin amide alkeneamine” in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in bacterial cells, in vitro;

Registry Number 7398

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 5, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed for at least 30 minutes. Indicate that immediate medical attention should be obtained;

Registry Number 7405

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients (zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate II and alkaryl arylamine) in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;

2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for at least 20 minutes. Also disclose that contaminated clothing should be removed under running water;

Registry Number 7424

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 26, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7425

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 26, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient “fatty acid/amine reaction product” in an acceptable manner;

Registry Number 7428

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 19, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products;

Registry Number 7429

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 3, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in bacterial cells, in vitro;

Registry Number 7456

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 30, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that “long chain alkyl amine” has been shown to cause dermal sensitization in laboratory animals;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀(oral, rat) value of 612 mg/kg, an LD₅₀(dermal, rabbit) value of 251 mg/kg, and an LC₅₀(4 hours, rat) value of 157 ppm for “long chain alkyl amine”;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2 710 mg/kg for “alkyl phosphate”;

4. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B;

Registry Number 7457

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 30, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of “long chain alkenyl succinimide” in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀(oral, rat) value of 612 mg/kg, an LD₅₀(dermal, rabbit) value of 251 mg/kg, and an LC₅₀(4 hours, rat) value of 157 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient “long chain alkyl amine”;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4.88 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 1.23 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkyl phosphate 1”;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2 710 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkyl phosphate 2”;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3 200 mg/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 1.95 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkyl phosphonate”;

6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B;

Registry Number 7460

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 3, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients (polyolefin amide alkeneamine and alkylphosphorothioate, alkyl amine) in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of > 2 000 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredients “alkylphosphonate, long chain alkyl amine” and “alkylphorothioat, alkyl amine”;

Registry Number 7461

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 16, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient known as “alkoxylated long chain alkyl alcohol” in an acceptable manner;

Registry Numbers 7462, 7463, and 7671

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 3, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkylphenol polyoxyalkyl alkylamine” has been shown to cause dermal sensitization in laboratory animals;

Registry Number 7477

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 11, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of “calcium long chain alkyl phenate sulfide” in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

Registry Number 7497

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 16, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 6.5 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkyl polysulfides”;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2 551 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkyl amine”;

Registry Number 7508

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 22, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of “chlorite” in the controlled product, together with its CAS Registry Number (1318-59-8) and percent concentration (1–5%);

Registry Number 7512

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose the presence of “poly(oxyalkylene) alkaryl ether” in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

Registry Number 7537

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 3, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional hazardous ingredients (sulfurized long chain alkyl acid ester and long chain alkyl phosphonate) in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the heart has stopped;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: Do not induce vomiting. If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes;

6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

7. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

8. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 612 mg/kg, an LD₅₀(dermal, rabbit) value of 251 mg/kg, and an LC₅₀(4 hours, rat) value of 157 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient “long chain alkyl amine”;

Registry Number 7554

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 19, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of “calcium long chain alkyl phenate sulfide” in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products;

Registry Number 7556

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 24, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS.

1. Disclose the chemical identity, CAS registry number and concentration of “unidentified impurities”;

2. Disclose a lower LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 2 460 mg/kg for “isobutanol”;

3. Disclose a lower LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2.193 mg/kg for “2-butanol”;

Registry Number 7564

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 19, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

Registry Number 7571

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 17, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7576

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 29, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of three additional hazardous ingredients (“trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate”, “siloxanes and silicones, di-Me, reaction products with silica”, and “diisobutyl phthalate”) in the controlled product, together with their CAS registry numbers and percent concentrations;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 5.66 mL/kg, and an LD₅₀(dermal, rabbit) value of 16 mg/kg for the ingredient “trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate”;

3. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 1 mg/m³ for “trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate”;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);

Registry Number 7578

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 9, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen and hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause CNS effects, up to and including coma and death in humans;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 8 mL/kg, and an LC₅₀ (8 hours, rat, female) value of 19 000 ppm mg/L for “propanol, 2-”;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2.83 mL/kg, and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 3.56 mL/kg for the confidential ingredient “alcohol”;

5. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels;

Registry Number 7583

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add ingestion as a route of entry;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement such as the following: Never give anything by mouth if the casualty is rapidly losing consciousness, or is unconscious or convulsing. If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

5. Disclose oxides of carbon and sulphur as hazardous combustion products;

6. Disclose Exposure Limit Values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients (oxidizing salt and Fluorinating agent);

7. Disclose LD₅₀ values for the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner or disclose a calculated LD₅₀ for the controlled product;

8. Disclose an LC₅₀ value for “oxidizing salt” in an acceptable manner;

9. Disclose that “oxidizing salt” is a skin sensitizer;

10. Disclose that “oxidizing salt” has been shown to be a respiratory sensitizer;

11. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A;

Registry Number 7584

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of “sodium (C14-16) olefin sulfonate” in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. Add ingestion as a route of entry;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement such as the following: Never give anything by mouth if the casualty is rapidly losing consciousness, or is unconscious or convulsing. If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

6. Disclose oxides of carbon and sulphur as hazardous combustion products;

7. Disclose Exposure Limit Values for two of the confidential hazardous ingredients (oxidizing salt and fluorinating agent);

8. Disclose LD₅₀ values for the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner or disclose a calculated LD₅₀ for the controlled product;

9. Disclose an LC₅₀ value for “oxidizing salt” in an acceptable manner;

10. Disclose that “oxidizing salt” is a skin sensitizer;

11. Disclose that “oxidizing salt” has been shown to be a respiratory sensitizer;

12. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels;

13. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A;

Registry Number 7585

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add ingestion as a route of entry;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement such as the following: Never give anything by mouth if the casualty is rapidly losing consciousness, or is unconscious or convulsing. If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

4. Disclose oxides of carbon and sulphur as hazardous combustion products;

5. Disclose Exposure Limit Values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (fluorinating agent);

6. Disclose LD₅₀ values for the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner or disclose a calculated LD₅₀ for the controlled product;

Registry Number 7588

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 16, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

Registry Numbers 7600 and 7601

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose “poly(oxyalkylene) alkaryl ether” in the controlled product, and disclose its concentration in an acceptable manner;

2. Disclose oxides of nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A;

Registry Number 7602

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 11, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose “poly(oxyalkylene) alkaryl ether” in the controlled product, and disclose its concentration in an acceptable manner;

2. Disclose oxides of nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

Registry Number 7603

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to induce vomiting and replace it with a statement that vomiting should not be induced;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with large amounts of water for at least 30 minutes;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is a skin sensitizer (long chain alkyl acid);

4. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause hearing loss in laboratory animals;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg for “xylene”;

Registry Numbers 7604 and 7605

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7611

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 21, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A;

2. If the WHMIS pictograms are displayed on the MSDS, disclose the appropriate hazard symbol for a material causing immediate and serious toxic effects;

3. Disclose a dermal LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (amine compound #2) in an acceptable manner;

4. Disclose LC₅₀ values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (amine compound #2) in an acceptable manner;

Registry Number 7662

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 8, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of sulfur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

Registry Number 7670

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 24, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner (oxyalkylated fatty alcohol B);

Registry Number 7674

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an additional confidential hazardous ingredient in the controlled product (long chain alkenyl succinimide), and disclose its concentration in an acceptable manner;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 4.94 mL/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 1.25 mL/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkyl phosphate #1”;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2 710 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkyl phosphate #2”;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3.2 g/kg and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 2.0 mL/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkyl phosphonate”;

6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B;

Registry Number 7678

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 17, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient (fatty acid salt) in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (substituted amino acid) in an acceptable manner;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. Add oxides of nitrogen and hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products;

5. Disclose that one ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as a confirmed animal carcinogen with unknown relevance to humans (A3) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH);

Registry Number 7681

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add ingestion as a route of entry;

2. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B;

3. Disclose the presence of four additional hazardous ingredients (formaldehyde, acetophenone, acetic acid and methanol) in the controlled product, together with their CAS registry numbers and percent concentrations;

4. Disclose Exposure Limit Values for three of the hazardous ingredients (acetophenone, acetic acid and methanol);

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been classified as a suspected human carcinogen (A2) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH);

6. Disclose oral LD₅₀ values for “acetophenone”, “acetic acid” and “methanol” in an acceptable manner;

7. Disclose an LC₅₀ value for “acetic acid” in an acceptable manner;

8. Disclose a dermal LD₅₀ value for “methanol” in an acceptable manner;

9. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in laboratory animals;

10. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive test results in in vitro screening tests for mutagenicity;

11. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive test results in an in vivo screening test for mutagenicity;

12. Disclose that exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause metabolic acidosis, and adverse effects on the gastrointestinal tract, CNS and cardiopulmonary system;

13. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is considered to be a teratogen;

Registry Number 7684

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 24, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of three additional hazardous ingredients [solvent naphtha (petroleum), heavy aromatic, calcium phenalate and ethylene glycol] in the controlled product, together with their CAS registry numbers and percent concentrations;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause dermal sensitization in laboratory animals;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals;

Registry Number 7685

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 7, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement “give 2 glasses of water to drink”;

6. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 1.7–2.7 g/kg, and an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 2.3 g/kg for “silicon dioxide”;

7. Disclose that chronic exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the blood of laboratory animals;

8. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals;

Registry Number 7688

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 30, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 30 minutes;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement “give 2 glasses of water to drink”;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 1 mL/kg for “ethanolamine”;

Registry Number 7692

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 17, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7693

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

Registry Numbers 7697 and 7698

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 9 200 mg/kg for “hexamethylene tetramine”;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in bacterial cells, in vitro;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A;

Registry Number 7712

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 13, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (ethoxylated alcohol) in an acceptable manner;

Registry Number 7720

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 27, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add ingestion as a route of entry;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals;

Registry Numbers 7721 and 7835

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Replace the percent concentration range for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate) with an acceptable WHMIS percent concentration range;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin irritation in laboratory animals;

Registry Number 7730

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 10, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose those measures necessary in cases of ingestion;

2. Disclose that the controlled product is incompatible with aluminum and magnesium;

3. Disclose LD₅₀ values for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (ethoxylated alcohol #2) in an acceptable manner;

4. Modify the label to disclose that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product;

5. Modify the label to disclose those measures necessary in cases of ingestion;

Registry Number 7745

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 7, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient (calcium long chain alkyl phenate sulfide) in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Disclose oxides of sulphur and nitrogen as hazardous combustion products;

Registry Number 7750

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 1, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 1 870 mg/kg for “propanol”;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 12.2 mL/kg for “n-butylacetate”;

3. Add eye contact as a route of entry;

4. Disclose that acute inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause damage to the respiratory tract;

5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in laboratory animals;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects;

7. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse reproductive effects in laboratory animals;

8. Correctly identify the OEL (QUE) exposure limit values for the hazardous ingredients “propanol” and “n-butylacetate”;

Registry Number 7752

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 10, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (aromatic polyglycol ether) in an acceptable manner;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects;

Registry Number 7754

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 9, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the percent concentration of the hazardous ingredient “mixture of severely hydrotreated and hydrocracked base oil (petroleum)” in an acceptable manner;

Registry Number 7770

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 23, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Numbers 7771 and 7772

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 7, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian and bacterial cells, in vitro;

Registry Number 7773

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 3, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7777

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

2. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, rat) value of 13.9 mg/L for “cyclohexane”;

3. Disclose the lower LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg for “xylene”;

Registry Number 7790

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 21, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional hazardous ingredients in the controlled product, together with their CAS registry numbers and percent concentrations;

Registry Number 7794

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 29, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7807

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 8, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Replace the percent concentration ranges for the hazardous ingredients shown on the MSDS with acceptable WHMIS percent concentration ranges;

Registry Number 7821

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 1, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for 60 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E;

4. Clarify that the ACGIH TWA Exposure Limit Value of 1 000 ppm shown on the MSDS for the hazardous ingredient “ethanol” is actually a “STEL” value;

Registry Number 7822

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 1, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E;

Registry Number 7823

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 1, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause skin corrosion in laboratory animals;

3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (aminothioate derivative) in an acceptable manner;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 8 mL/kg for “isopropanol”;

Registry Number 7842

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 11, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetal injury in laboratory animals, at maternally toxic dose levels;

4. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused CNS effects leading to coma in humans;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (carbamic acid ester) in an acceptable manner;

6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B;

Registry Number 7843

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 11, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients [(mixed alcohol, ethers and aldehydes) and (alkyl carbonate)] in the controlled product, together with their percent concentrations;

2. Disclose the percent concentration of five of the hazardous ingredients in an acceptable manner (heterocyclic organic compound, butanol, modified thiocarbamate, carbamic acid ester and modified thiocarbamate);

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetal injury in laboratory animals, at maternally toxic dose levels;

5. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has caused CNS effects leading to coma in humans;

6. Disclose LD₅₀ values for the confidential hazardous ingredients (heterocyclic organic compound and carbamic acid ester);

7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B;

8. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value AIHA WEEL–TWA = 0.001 ppm (skin) for the confidential hazardous ingredient “heterocyclic organic compound”;

Registry Numbers 7844 and 7863

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 16, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7854

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 19, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

Registry Number 7859

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 3, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2.14 g/kg and an LC₅₀ (aerosol, 4 hours, rat) value of 375 mg/m³ for “sulfuric acid”;

2. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.2 mg/m³ for “sulfuric acid”;

Registry Number 7872

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 16, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of two additional hazardous ingredients in the controlled product (triethylene glycol and methyl alcohol), together with their CAS registry numbers and percent concentrations;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for “triethylene glycol” in an acceptable manner;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for “heavy catalytic reformed naptha” in an acceptable manner;

4. Disclose the Exposure Limit Values ACGIH TLV–TWA = 200 ppm and ACGIH TLV–STEL = 250 ppm for “methyl alcohol”;

Registry Number 7873

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 11, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to be corrosive to the eyes of laboratory animals;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be flushed continuously with water for 30 minutes;

3. Add oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

Registry Number 7874

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7875

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 25, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of one additional hazardous ingredient (chlorite) in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

Registry Number 7891

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 8, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product may cause chemical burns to the gastrointestinal tract;

2. Add ingestion as a route of entry;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed with water for 60 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, add a statement such as the following: If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration;

Registry Number 7892

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 10, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7902

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 15, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7903

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 30, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement “give 2 glasses of water to drink”;

2. Add oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose the specific density, melting point, and coefficient of water/oil distribution of the controlled product;

Registry Number 7904

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 6, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement “give 2 glasses of water to drink”;

2. Add oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous combustion products;

3. Disclose the lower and upper flammable limits, and the auto-ignition temperature;

4. Disclose the specific gravity, vapour density, vapour pressure and melting point of the controlled product;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for the confidential hazardous ingredient (aliphatic acid ester) in an acceptable manner;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals at maternally toxic dose levels;

Registry Number 7908

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 10, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose an LD₅₀ (dermal, rabbit) value of 8 mL/kg for “isopropanol”;

Registry Number 7910

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 19, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E;

Registry Number 7918

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 24, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient (zinc alkyldithiophosphate 2) in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

3. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous decomposition products;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (zinc alkyldithiophosphate 2) in an acceptable manner;

Registry Number 7921

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient (sulfosuccinate half ester salt #2) in the controlled product;

2. Replace the percent concentration range for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (sulfosuccinate half ester salt #2) shown on the MSDS with an acceptable WHMIS percent concentration range;

Registry Number 7922

Date of notice confirming acceptance: February 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Replace the percent concentration range for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (ethoxylated alcohol) shown on the MSDS with an acceptable WHMIS percent concentration range;

Registry Numbers 7926 and 7928

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 12, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, male rat) value of 7 093 ppm for “methyl methacrylate”;

3. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro;

Registry Number 7950

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 16, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 7952

Date of notice confirming acceptance: March 31, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Numbers 7973 and 7977

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 8, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulfur to the list of hazardous combustion products.

Registry Number 7974

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 8, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulfur to the list of hazardous combustion products;

2. Disclose the presence of an additional hazardous ingredient (carboxylic acid polymer, sodium salt) in the controlled product, together with its percent concentration;

Registry Numbers 7975 and 7976

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–STEL = 3 mg/m³ for “phosphoric acid”;

2. Disclose the presence of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient (carboxylic acid polymer, sodium salt) in the controlled product;

Registry Numbers 7978 and 7979

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 14, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–STEL = 3 mg/m³ for “phosphoric acid”;

Registry Number 7980

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 8, 2011

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products;

In the case of the following claims, either the claimant did not supply the screening officer with a signed undertaking or the screening officer was not satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified in it. Pursuant to subsection 17.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the screening officer ordered the claimant to comply with the requirements of the relevant legislation within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER ORDERED THE CLAIMANT TO COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that the screening officer ordered to be disclosed on a material safety data sheet reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 7361

Date of order: June 3, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed for at least 30 minutes;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed for at least 30 minutes;

4. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 2.14 mL/kg for “n-(aminoethyl)piperazine”;

5. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause adverse effects on the kidneys of laboratory animals;

6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in laboratory animals.

Registry Number 7486

Date of order: March 14, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. Disclose the chemical identity of “crystalline silica,” together with its CAS registry number and percent concentration;

2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for at least 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

3. Add oxides of nitrogen and hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products;

4. Disclose the Exposure Limit Value ACGIH TLV–TWA = 0.025 mg/m³ for “crystalline silica”;

5. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat) value of 1.13 g/kg for “aromatic alcohol polyglycol ether”;

Registry Number 7488

Date of order: June 3, 2011

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format and content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. Disclose that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product;

3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the label for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed with soap and water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

Note: The following claims were cancelled after the issuance of the decisions and thus neither was a signed undertaking provided nor was an order issued. The screening officer has identified the following instances of non-compliance with the requirements of the relevant legislation.

Registry Number 7551

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed;

2. Disclose an LD₅₀ (oral, rat, male) value of 3 523 mg/kg for “xylene”;

3. Disclose an LC₅₀ (4 hours, vapour, rat) value of 3 200 ppm for “n-nonane”;

4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been sh

Registry Numbers 7626 and 7627

own to cause mutagenic effects in vitro;

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, modify or remove the statement to give water to drink;

2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product (organic amine) is a skin sensitizer;

3. Disclose an LD₅₀ value for one of the confidential hazardous ingredients (organic amine) in an acceptable manner;

Pursuant to paragraphs 18(1)(a) and 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the screening officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Pursuant to subsection 24(3) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended labels must be available in both official languages.

Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a screening officer. It also affords the opportunity to an affected party to appeal an undertaking. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, to the Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, 613-998-2363 (telephone).

GERHARD BRUINS
Acting Chief Screening Officer

[42-1-o]

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ACT

Permission granted

The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to section 116 of the Public Service Employment Act, hereby gives notice that it has granted permission, pursuant to subsection 115(2) of the said Act, to Michael Jay Britton, Food Services Officer (GS-FOS-6), Correctional Service of Canada, Agassiz, British Columbia, to be a candidate, before and during the election period, for the position of Councillor for the City of Chilliwack, British Columbia, in the municipal election to be held on November 19, 2011.

October 4, 2011

KATHY NAKAMURA
Director General
Political Activities Directorate

[42-1-o]