Canada Gazette, Part I, Volume 158, Number 13: Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Made Under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act (Imports, Exports and Safeguards)

March 30, 2024

Statutory authority
Nuclear Safety and Control Act

Sponsoring agency
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission

REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT

(This statement is not part of the Regulations.)

Executive summary

Issues: Canada has international obligations related to nuclear non-proliferation that are implemented domestically through Canadian regulations. Misalignment between these regulations and the implementation of international agreements hinders Canada’s ability to meet the commitments it has made to the peaceful use of nuclear energy.

Description: The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) is proposing to update the General Nuclear Safety and Control Regulations (GNSCR) to add requirements related to safeguards. Specifically, the proposed changes would introduce new requirements for any person either possessing small amounts of nuclear material or engaged in nuclear fuel cycle-related research and development and/or in nuclear-related manufacturing activities. The proposed amendments would also include lifting the need to present a licence at the border when exporting or importing prescribed information.

The CNSC is also proposing to update the Nuclear Non-proliferation Import and Export Control Regulations (NNIECR) to include the latest revisions to international control lists, introduce new licence exemptions, enhance licensing information and harmonize record retention periods.

Rationale: Amending the GNSCR and the NNIECR would ensure Canada’s regulatory framework is aligned with its safeguards agreements and internationally agreed export controls. It would also support the CNSC’s responsibilities with respect to the oversight of nuclear materials, nuclear fuel cycle-related research and development and nuclear-related manufacturing, as well as the export of controlled nuclear substances, equipment and information.

Issues

The proposed amendments are intended to address the following issues:

(1) GNSCR

Safeguards requirements

Safeguards refer to an international system of monitoring and verifying nuclear material and specified nuclear activities, administered in Canada by the CNSC and verified by the IAEA, to deter the diversion of nuclear material from legitimate peaceful activities. Due to emerging safeguards challenges and increased international nuclear development, the IAEA has revised its approach to implementing safeguards in recent years. This has led to greater scrutiny of small quantities of nuclear material as well as nuclear fuel cycle-related research and development and nuclear-related manufacturing. The CNSC has identified persons/organizations that possess such nuclear material or perform these activities, but that currently fall outside of the CNSC’s regulatory authorities. These persons have been voluntarily providing the information and inspection access that is required to fulfill Canada’s safeguard obligations, upon request. There are likely other persons, currently outside of the CNSC’s regulatory authority, who have not provided the information necessary for the CNSC to make correct and complete declarations to the IAEA. The CNSC’s reliance on voluntary reporting and inspection access, while functional, is not a best practice and it has become clear that changes to the GNSCR are necessary to respond to the IAEA’s revised approach to safeguards implementation.

Prescribed information

Exporters/importers have moved away from transmitting prescribed informationfootnote 1 using physical formats and now share that information digitally. Presently, the GNSCR require licensees to present a copy of their CNSC licence to a Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) customs officer when exporting/importing prescribed information (for example plans, engineering designs, manuals or instructions), regardless of the format. Some licensees have continued to send their CNSC licence to the CBSA when importing or exporting prescribed information electronically. The proposed changes to the GNSCR would remove the obligation to present a physical copy of the CNSC licence to a customs officer when importing/exporting prescribed information; however, all prescribed information would continue to be subject to import/export authorization from the CNSC.

(2) NNIECR

International control lists

In addition to being a party to the NPT, Canada has made commitments to various multilateral export control regimes, such as the Zangger Committee and the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), which produce the Trigger List and the NSG Guidelines, respectively. These documents outline what nuclear substances, equipment and information should be controlled, based on their risk to contribute to nuclear weapons development (that is their proliferation risk), and are updated by the Zangger Committee and NSG regularly.

Note: Throughout this document, any references to “nuclear substances, equipment and information” include nuclear-related dual-use substances, equipment and information. The term “dual use” refers to the potential for a nuclear-related item to be used not only in civilian applications, but also in nuclear weapons-related activities.

The NNIECR contain schedules with information from the Trigger List and NSG Guidelines. The NNIECR schedule is not current with the latest update and is misaligned with some other countries’ regulations, which have already incorporated the latest export control information. Discrepancies or differences among export controls between countries can increase proliferation risk.

In addition, Global Affairs Canada (GAC), the department that regulates the export of controlled goods and technology, including nuclear material and equipment, has already updated its regulation, the Export Control List, to align with the latest Trigger List and NSG Guidelines. The consequences of not having the latest Trigger List and NSG Guidelines in the NNIECR create challenges and confusion for Canadians exporting nuclear substances, prescribed equipment and information.

Licence exemptions

The NNIECR currently place regulatory controls over the import and export of controlled nuclear substances in certain forms, above and beyond what the Zangger Committee and NSG require, even if they pose a low risk for contributing to nuclear weapons development. Continuing to control these substances creates an unnecessary burden and unnecessary costs for licensees.

Licensing information

In CNSC’s import/export applications, all the information required from the applicant to facilitate efficient processing and regulatory oversight is not requested. The CNSC often needs to contact applicants to request additional information, such as an applicant’s Canadian business address, email address or process documents. In addition, the CBSA is responsible for enforcing CNSC’s regulations at the border when licensees are importing/exporting controlled nuclear substances or equipment. The CBSA has had to unnecessarily hold nuclear substances or equipment until they were able to validate import licences with the CNSC since there is no common identifier in the licence, such as the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) business number.

Record retention periods

The NNIECR do not include a record retention period for documents relating to the import/export of controlled nuclear substances, equipment and information. If a CNSC regulation does not specify a record retention period, licensees only have to keep their records for a period of one year after the expiry of their licence. This can complicate oversight and compliance activities.

Background

Canada’s policy on nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament is based on the NPT, which Canada has been a party to since 1970. The CNSC contributes to implementing Canada’s nuclear non-proliferation policy.

Nuclear non-proliferation involves measures aimed at preventing the acquisition and spread of nuclear weapons. This includes measures that lower the risk of diversion of items from the civilian nuclear fuel cycle to nuclear weapons development. Safeguards refers to the measures taken by the IAEA, in accordance with the NPT, to verify that nuclear material is not diverted from peaceful uses, which includes performing routine inspections and other verification activities in Canada.

Through its import/export licensing process, the CNSC takes steps to assure that Canada’s nuclear exports and imports are used solely for peaceful purposes and do not contribute to development of nuclear weapons.

The Nuclear Safety and Control Act (NSCA) establishes the CNSC’s authority to set regulatory requirements for all nuclear-related activities in Canada, including making associated regulations, such as with

Through the NSCA and its regulations, the CNSC implements the following commitments of Canada as a State party to the NPT:

The proposed amendments to the GNSCR and NNIECR are intended to align Canadian regulations with the following texts.

Safeguards Agreement and Additional Protocol

Canada’s obligations under the NPT are further elaborated in the following documents.

Under the Agreement Between the Government of Canada and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (Safeguards Agreement), all nuclear material, which is generally defined “as uranium, thorium and plutonium-239, excluding uranium or thorium naturally occurring in soil, rock or ore,” is subject to the Agreement. There is no minimum quantity for IAEA reporting and inspection access. Many CNSC licensees are required to regularly report on the inventory and movement of nuclear material. However, the CNSC’s regulations allow for certain quantities of this nuclear material to be possessed without a licence. For example, the CNSC’s Nuclear Substances and Radiation Devices Regulations allow the possession of up to 10 kg of natural uranium without a licence when not used for its radiation properties.

Similarly, under the Protocol Additional to the Agreement Between Canada and the Internationl Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (Additional Protocol), the Government of Canada reports on certain nuclear fuel cycle-related research and development and nuclear-related manufacturing activities to the IAEA; however, some of these activities do not require a CNSC licence and therefore are not regulated by the CNSC.

As the agency responsible for implementing the Safeguards Agreement and Additional Protocol, the CNSC is proposing to amend the GNSCR.

Trigger List and NSG Guidelines

Canada is a Member of the Zangger Committee and a Participating Government of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG):

Members of the Zangger Committee and Participating Governments of the NSG agree by consensus on lists of items whose exports must be regulated and have committed to incorporate the lists into their national legislations.

In its role representing Canada on the Zangger Committee and NSG, the CNSC is proposing changes to the NNIECR.

Objective

The objective of the regulatory proposal is to ensure that the GNSCR reflect Canada’s international obligations related to safeguards and that the NNIECR align with the current internationally agreed export controls. The goal of this regulatory proposal is to

(1) Amend the GNSCR to

(2) Amend the NNIECR to

Description

(1) GNSCR

The GNSCR require all CNSC licensees to “take all necessary measures to facilitate Canada’s compliance with any applicable safeguards agreement.”

Broaden safeguards requirements

The Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Made Under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act (Imports, Exports and Safeguards) [the proposed Regulations] would require any person in Canada who possesses nuclear material and/or is engaged in nuclear fuel cycle-related research and development and/or nuclear-related manufacturing activities to

Under the GNSCR, many CNSC licensees, including power and research reactors, waste management facilities for nuclear material, uranium processing facilities and research facilities, are required to report and monitor nuclear material and activities and to provide access and assistance to IAEA safeguards inspectors. The proposed amendments would have no impact on these licensees.

However, there are others who are expected to be impacted:

Modernize border processes related to prescribed information

The proposed regulations would eliminate the requirement for licensees to present a CNSC licence to customs officers when importing or exporting prescribed information into Canada.

(2) NNIECR

The NNIECR set requirements associated with “the import and export of controlled nuclear substances, controlled nuclear equipment and controlled nuclear information.”

Align with international control lists

An important tool Canada has used to meet its international commitments to the peaceful use of nuclear energy is the inclusion of content from the Trigger List and NSG Guidelines in the NNIECR’s schedule. The NNIECR schedule of controlled nuclear substances, equipment and information would be amended to reflect the Trigger List and NSG Guidelines by

Introduce licence exemptions

The proposed regulations would introduce exemptions in the NNIECR for items considered to be of very low risk to contribute to nuclear weapons development, such as tritium contained in self-luminous devices for personal use, watches and compasses. The proposed amendments would no longer require a person to obtain a licence to export or import such items.

Enhanced licensing information

The proposed Regulations would require applicants to provide the following additional information as part of licensing:

Harmonize record retention periods

The proposed Regulations would require a six-year retention period after the licence has expired, in alignment with other domestic statutes (e.g. the Export and Import Permits Act and the Customs Act) for key import and export records, including

(3) Consequential amendments

Consequential amendments are proposed to the Administrative Monetary Penalties Regulations (Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission) to reference the proposed Regulations accurately. In addition, the consequential amendments would include new administrative monetary penalties (AMPs) for the new proposed requirements in the GNSCR, such as

Regulatory development

Consultation

Discussion paper

The CNSC released discussion paper DIS-15-01: Proposal to Amend the Nuclear Non-proliferation Import and Export Control Regulations in March 2015 for a 120-day public comment period. The discussion paper, among other things, laid out the proposed amendments to the NNIECR and the proposal to remove from the GNSCR the requirement to present a copy of a CNSC licence when importing or exporting controlled nuclear information. The CNSC sought input on these proposed amendments via its website and Facebook page, and sent an information bulletin to all stakeholders on its email subscription list, which includes over 4 000 subscribers. The consultation notice was also posted on Consulting with Canadians, a Government of Canada website that enables federal departments and agencies to consult more broadly with the public on government policies and programs.

Ten medium and large licensees, mostly nuclear power reactors and uranium mines and mills, submitted comments. Overall, they supported maintaining alignment with international control lists and the proposed exemptions of items considered to be of very low risk to contribute to nuclear weapons development. All stakeholders supported removing the requirement for licensees to present a copy of their CNSC licence to a customs officer when importing or exporting controlled nuclear information. Stakeholders also supported extending the record retention period for import/export licences in the NNIECR.

Since medium and large licensees already have established processes and procedures as part of their management systems, there was general support for the proposed amendment to include the submission of written procedures during licensing. It was understood by stakeholders that this requirement would aid in ensuring the applicant’s compliance with the proposed Regulations. However, some commenters noted that this requirement may increase regulatory burden for small licensees. Since this requirement would be a one-time expense that facilitates compliance activities, the CNSC considered it necessary to keep. However, the proposed amendment was revised to require a higher-level process document, rather than a detailed procedure. The CNSC also committed to provide clarification on what would be expected in the submitted process documents as part of future regulatory guidance materials.

Targeted consultation on the GNSCR safeguards requirements

In 2016, CNSC staff conducted a targeted consultation via email with stakeholders who did not require a CNSC licence, including those who were already reporting on a voluntary basis. Responses indicated that stakeholders understood the need for the CNSC to incorporate these requirements into regulations, in accordance with commitments made in the various safeguards agreements. One comment from a prospective licensee questioned how the CNSC would protect proprietary information. The CNSC assured this company that, as per current practice, any information submitted to the CNSC for safeguards purposes would be stored and transmitted securely, and only shared with the appropriate authority (the IAEA), when the CNSC is required to do so.

In addition, outreach clarifying the reporting requirements already in place for CNSC licensees under paragraph 12(1)(i) of the GNSCR was conducted via email and phone in 2016 with approximately 200 CNSC licensees that were identified as potentially

Stakeholders expressed general support for broadening the safeguards requirements following the consultation discussions.

Consultation sessions

Further consultations and updates on the project and proposed amendments to the GNSCR and NNIECR were posted on the CNSC’s electronic consultation platform, Let’s Talk Nuclear Safety, from May 17 to June 30, 2021. A notification was sent to the CNSC’s general email list along with an email to over 200 targeted organizations that could potentially be impacted by the changes. The CNSC received comments from 8 licensees, including nuclear reactor facilities, uranium mines and mills, a health science company and a tritium light source manufacturing facility. Stakeholders requested details on the proposed updates to the GNSCR and NNIECR and asked for clarification on the implementation of the proposed Regulations.

The CNSC then held two workshops on November 4, 2021, to discuss the amendments to the GNSCR and NNIECR and their potential impacts. The CNSC shared the proposed amendments with registrants by email in advance of the workshops. Over 200 stakeholders participated at the workshops, including representatives from nuclear power reactor facilities, uranium mines and mills, universities, hospitals, federal and provincial health departments, and environmental non-governmental organizations.

Most of the comments and questions received were on clarifying whether the new requirements or exemptions would apply to specific licensees or non-licensees. CNSC staff confirmed that further details would be provided in revised regulatory documents, which the CNSC uses to provide guidance on how to meet regulatory requirements.

Stakeholders also suggested that the exemption to obtain an export licence for self-luminous devices used in aircraft, ships and conveyance vehicles (e.g. exit signs) be extended to all self-luminous devices containing tritium (e.g. self-powered torches that do not require batteries). In response, the CNSC has proposed to exempt a certain export licensing requirement for self-luminous sources or devices.

Prepublication in Canada Gazette, Part I

The proposed Regulations are being prepublished in Part I of the Canada Gazette for 75 days.

Modern treaty obligations and Indigenous engagement and consultation

The assessment examined the geographical scope and subject matter of the initiative in relation to modern treaties in effect and did not identify any potential modern treaty implications. In addition, as part of the CNSC’s commitment to engage with First Nations and Indigenous communities, the CNSC reached out to potentially impacted First Nations with modern treaties, which were identified by Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada. No specific questions or comments on the proposed Regulations have been received to date.

Instrument choice

Canada cannot ratify an international treaty until measures are in place to ensure that the terms of the treaty are enforceable in Canadian law. Canada has used the GNSCR and the NNIECR, in part, to ensure that Canadians are respecting the commitments outlined in the NPT. The proposed Regulations would enable Canada to meet its international safeguards commitments through the NPT.

Regulatory analysis

Benefits and costs

Although some of the new requirements in the GNSCR and NNIECR would result in costs to licensees, non-licensees and the CNSC, the overall proposal would represent a total net benefit of $1.7 million.

The main concern expressed by stakeholders during consultation had to do with the costs associated with the submission of import/export procedures. This requirement was subsequently revised to only require the submission of import/export processes, which tend to be higher-level documents that take less time to prepare. One CNSC licensee was also satisfied by the proposal to exempt all self-luminous devices from export licences when destined for an NSG country, since the savings would be considerable.

The cost-benefit analysis (CBA) for this proposal has presented a challenge since updates to the GNSCR and NNIECR would impact different stakeholders. Although the CNSC has put a lot of effort in its outreach activities for this proposal, there may still be some non-licensees who possess nuclear material or perform activities captured by these amendments that are unknown to the CNSC and who may not have been made aware of the proposal.

Methodology

Monetized impacts are calculated using the Standard Cost Model (PDF) from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. This is an internationally recognized methodology for determining and calculating the monetized effects of government regulation on business. The Standard Cost Model calculates costs by estimating the time required to complete a required task and multiplying it by the hourly wage of the employee(s) responsible for performing the task, the frequency that the task must be performed and the number of businesses affected by the requirement.

An hourly rate of $70/hour for licensees or non-licensees and $50/hour for CNSC staff are used in the CBA. Present value totals are in 2022 Canadian dollars, discounted to 2025 using a rate of 7% over a 10-year time period (2025–2034), as directed by the Policy on Cost-Benefit Analysis.

Affected stakeholders

The number of impacted licensees and non-licensees was determined by benchmarking information available to the CNSC for the last five years. In this CBA,

Many CNSC licensees are not impacted by the proposed amendments under the GNSCR since they already meet the regulatory requirements related to safeguards. However, for the GNSCR, it is expected that 45 small licensees and non-licensees would be impacted by the requirements to provide safeguards information and access for verification. No impacts are expected for lifting the requirement to present a CNSC licence to a customs officer.

For the NNIECR, there would be approximately 300 small licensees that would need to develop and submit their import/export processes, which would present a minimal one-time cost. Approximately 75 small, medium, and large licensees would benefit from the new licence exemptions related to nuclear substances that pose a low risk for contributing to nuclear weapons development. No impacts are expected for the new record retention period.

GNSCR
Costs to industry

The proposed updates to the GNSCR would impose a total cost of $98,630 (present value) on small licensees and non-licensees.

The development and submission of an annual report on nuclear material would affect approximately 45 licensees and non-licensees and is expected to take up to 10 hours in the first year and two hours in each of the following years for each licensee/non-licensee. The relatively large upfront costs are due to licensees/non-licensees needing first to become familiarized with the content of the reports and the IAEA nomenclature.

The reporting of inventory changes is expected to impact 45 small licensees and non-licensees and it would take approximately one hour to produce each report.

Approximately 45 small licensees and non-licensees conduct nuclear fuel cycle-related research and development activities and would need to start reporting annually. This activity is expected to take up to 10 hours in the first year and 5 hours in each of the following years.

Fewer than 15 small licensees and non-licensees conduct nuclear-related manufacturing activities. Reporting requirements could take up to 10 hours in the first year and 5 hours in each of the following years.

The CNSC expects an overlap between these numbers, since licensees or non-licensees could both possess nuclear material and be engaged in nuclear fuel cycle-related research and development or nuclear-related manufacturing activities or be engaged simultaneously in research and development activities and manufacturing.

The CNSC expects the IAEA to verify between one and three small licensees or non-licensees per year. It would take about 10 hours for these licensees and non-licensees to prepare for the verification, assist the inspectors and participate in follow-up discussions. These inspections are expected to cost these licensees and non-licensees $1,600 per year.

Benefits to industry

The removal of the requirement to present a CNSC license to a customs officer would not result in either a cost or a saving.

NNIECR
Costs to industry

The proposed requirement to develop and submit the import and export processes would affect approximately 300 smaller licensees and represent a one-time cost of $131,250 in the first year (present value cost of $122,364) after the amendments come into force. Once licensees have submitted their processes, they would only need to resubmit their processes if major changes occur.

The additional record keeping requirement would not impose costs, since licensees are already keeping records for six years, as per other domestic legislations (e.g. the Export and Import Permits Act and the Customs Act). Larger licensees, such as nuclear reactor and uranium processing facilities, are already required under the Class I Nuclear Facilities Regulations and the Uranium Mines and Mills Regulations to implement a management system (i.e. an organization’s manual of processes, procedures and practices used to ensure that it can fulfill all tasks required to achieve its objectives safely and consistently), which includes the submission of their import/export processes.

Benefits to industry

The addition of the CRA business number on the licence applications would improve efficiency at the border and during the CNSC assessment of the application. If the CRA business number appears on CNSC import/export licenses, the CBSA can easily match the licensee with other importer identification information already on record. Proposed amendments would also help ensure that licensees document their processes and are compliant with regulations.

The proposed exemptions in the NNIECR, for which a licence would no longer be required for items deemed to be of low proliferation significance, would affect approximately 75 small, medium and large licensees and would represent savings of $1.4 million (present value) to the industry.

Government impacts

For the GNSCR, there would be a cost increase of $136,044 (present value) for the government:

There would be no cost or savings to the government for the removal of the requirement to present a CNSC licence to a customs officer when importing/exporting controlled nuclear information, since licensees would still need to obtain a licence from the CNSC and therefore CNSC staff would still need to assess the applications and conduct verification activities (e.g. verify records of these types of imports/exports).

For the NNIECR, there would be a cost increase of $202,307 (present value) to the government for assessing the import/export processes of licensees that have not already been submitted in the past. The proposal would also result in government savings of $839,182, which is attributed to the CNSC no longer needing to review and process licence applications, issue licences and conduct oversight activities for the exempted low-proliferation nuclear substances, equipment and information.

Cost-benefit statement
Table 1: Monetized costs
Impacted stakeholder Description of cost 2025 2029 2034 Total (present value) Annualized value
Industry Reporting activities (GNSCR) $26,841 $11,981 $11,981 $98,630 $14,043
Reporting activities (NNIECR) $131,250 $0 $0 $122,664 $17,465
Government Administration (GNSCR) $35,470 $16,189 $16,189 $136,044 $19,370
Administration (NNIECR) $27,859 $27,859 $27,859 $202,307 $28,804
All stakeholders Total costs $221,420 $56,029 $56,029 $559,645 $79,682
Table 2: Monetized benefits
Impacted stakeholder Description of benefits 2025 2029 2034 Total (present value) Annualized value
Industry Reduced reporting activities (NNIECR) $204,101 $196,401 $192,201 $1,426,103 $203,045
Government Reduced administration $115,570 $115,570 $115,570 $839,182 $119,481
All stakeholders Total benefits $319,671 $311,971 $307,771 $2,265,284 $322,526
Table 3: Summary of monetized costs and benefits
Impacts 2025 2029 2034 Total (present value) Annualized value
Total costs $221,420 $56,029 $56,029 $559,645 $79,681
Total benefits $319,671 $311,971 $307,771 $2,265,284 $322,526
Net impact $98,252 $255,943 $251,743 $1,705,639 $242,845
Qualitative impacts

Qualitative benefits would result from the proposed amendments to the GNSCR, such as more complete reporting of nuclear material, nuclear fuel cycle-related research and development and nuclear-related manufacturing activities in Canada to the IAEA and improved compliance with international safeguards obligations.

The proposed amendments to the NNIECR would align Canada’s approach to import and export more closely with that of international partners that are part of the Zangger Committee and the NSG. The proposal also contributes to harmonizing domestic legislation, removing obstacles for importers/exporters and reducing confusion when conducting import/export activities.

Small business lens

The proposed amendments to both regulations are estimated to represent a net cost of $123,132 (present value) [$17,531 annualized] on small businesses. The total net cost per small business would be $360 ($51 annualized). All costs are expected to be administrative.

To ratify an international treaty, Canada must ensure that the terms of the treaty are enforceable in Canadian law. This means that alternative compliance mechanisms are not possible; therefore, no regulatory flexibility options were considered appropriate. However, the CNSC will remain flexible in the implementation of the requirements and discuss timelines with the individual impacted licensees and non-licensees.

GNSCR

The proposed reporting and inspection requirements in the GNSCR would impose a present value cost of $98,630 ($14,043 annualized) to 45 small licensees and non-licensees. It is anticipated that most of the costs would be related to the broadened safeguards requirements. The costs for the first year are expected to be considerably higher, since small licensees and non-licensees would first need to be made aware of the details to include in their reports.

Small licensees and non-licensees that have participated in the various consultation activities have expressed their support for this proposal and understand Canada’s safeguards commitments with the IAEA.

NNIECR

The net present cost to small business for the amendments to NNIECR would be $24,501, or $3,486 (annualized).

The new requirement to submit the import/export processes when submitting a licence application would affect approximately 300 smaller licensees and would result in a one-time cost of $122,664 (present value) or $17,465 (annualized).

Approximately 23 small businesses that import or export items deemed to be of low proliferation significance would benefit from total present value cost savings of $98,162 for annualized savings of $13,976.

Some commenters had voiced their concerns about adding costs to small businesses related to the enhanced licensing information. The original proposal had been to require licensees to produce and submit import and export procedures, which was later changed to process documents (less detailed than procedures), which represents a decrease in administrative burden.

Small business lens summary
Table 4: Compliance costs
Activity Annualized value Present value
Total compliance cost $0 $0
Table 5: Administrative costs
Activity Annualized value Present value
Administrative cost (GNSCR) 14,043 98,630
Administrative cost (NNIECR) 17,465 122,664
Administrative cost savings (13,976) (98,162)
Net administrative cost 17,531 123,132

One-for-one rule

The regulatory analysis above is for the combined impact of two sets of regulatory amendments. Each set would result in changes to administrative burden on business, which triggers application of the one-for-one rule. Under the one-for-one rule, implications for each set of regulatory amendments need to be disaggregated as below.

Reported values are estimated using the same assumptions as those used for costs and benefits described above (all costs on business are considered as administrative burden) and converted to 2012 Canadian dollars and discounted to 2012 present value using a rate of 7% (in accordance with the Red Tape Reduction Regulations).

GNSCR

The one-for-one rule applies, since there would be an incremental increase in administrative burden on business, and the proposal is considered a “burden in” under the rule. No regulatory titles would be repealed or introduced.

The amendments to the GNSCR would impose annualized administrative costs of $4,690, or $78.17 per business.

NNIECR

The one-for-one rule applies, since there would be an incremental decrease in administrative burden on business, and the proposal is considered a “burden out” under the rule. No regulatory titles would be repealed or introduced.

The amendments to the NNIECR would result in annualized administrative cost savings of $61,976, or $164.83 per business.

Regulatory cooperation and alignment

The proposed amendments would harmonize domestic regulations with the items already listed on the Export Control List, and the new record-keeping requirements would be consistent with those already set out in the Export and Import Permits Act and the Customs Act.

GNSCR

Canada and the United States have different obligations regarding safeguards. The United States is recognized by the NPT as a nuclear weapon state, along with China, France, Russia and the United Kingdom, while Canada is a non-nuclear weapon state and is therefore subject to a different set of safeguards requirements.

All non-nuclear weapon and nuclear-weapon states of the European Union are part of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), which has also brought into force safeguards agreements with the IAEA. Euratom and other non-nuclear weapon states outside of Europe, such as Japan and the United Arab Emirates, include safeguards requirements in their regulations, which are very similar to what is proposed for the GNSCR.

NNIECR

As with other members of the Zangger Committee and participating governments of the NSG, Canada has agreed to include the Trigger List and NSG Guidelines into its domestic legislation. The NNIECR schedule includes slight modifications and additions to the Trigger List and NSG Guidelines to adapt them to a Canadian context. These modifications provide more specificity to requirements for Canadian licensees.

The NNIECR are several editions behind the current Trigger List and NSG Guidelines, while the majority of the Zangger Committee members and NSG signatories have been keeping their regulations up to date.

Strategic environmental assessment

In accordance with the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals, a preliminary scan concluded that a strategic environmental assessment is not required.

Gender-based analysis plus

No gender-based analysis plus (GBA+) impacts have been identified for this proposal.

Implementation, compliance and enforcement, and service standards

Implementation

The proposed Regulations would come into force the day on which they are published in the Canada Gazette, Part II. The CNSC would work with licensees to coordinate the implementation of these proposed Regulations. Outreach and educational sessions would be organized with stakeholders, including non-licensees.

Compliance and enforcement

The proposed Regulations would be enforced in accordance with the CNSC’s existing enforcement policy.

Contact

Dana Beaton
Director General
Regulatory Policy Directorate
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
280 Slater Street
P.O. Box 1046, Station B
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5S9
Telephone: 613‑219‑0959
Email: consultation@cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca

PROPOSED REGULATORY TEXT

Notice is given that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, subject to the approval of the Governor in Council, proposes to make the annexed Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Made Under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act (Imports, Exports and Safeguards) under section 44footnote a of the Nuclear Safety and Control Act footnote b.

Interested persons may make representations concerning the proposed Regulations within 75 days after the date of publication of this notice. They are strongly encouraged to use the online commenting feature that is available on the Canada Gazette website but if they use email, mail or any other means, the representations should cite the Canada Gazette, Part I, and the date of publication of this notice, and be sent to Dana Beaton, Director General, Regulatory Policy Directorate, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, 280 Slater St., P.O. Box 1046, Station B, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9 (tel.: 613‑219‑0959; email: consultation@cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca).

Ottawa, March 26, 2024

Wendy Nixon
Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council

Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Made Under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act (Imports, Exports and Safeguards)

General Nuclear Safety and Control Regulations

1 Section 18 of the General Nuclear Safety and Control Regulations footnote 2 is replaced by the following:

2 Section 30 of the Regulations is amended by adding the following after subsection (2):

(3) Every person in possession of uranium, plutonium-239 or thorium must file a report with the Commission, on an annual basis, containing the following information:

(4) Every person referred to in subsection (3) must file a report with the Commission within one business day of the occurrence or establishment of the occurrence of any inventory changes containing the following information:

(5) Despite subsections (3) and (4), a person is not required to report on the following:

(6) Every person who conducts nuclear fuel cycle-related research and development activities or nuclear-related manufacturing activities in accordance with the safeguards agreement must file a report with the Commission, on or before March 15 of each year, containing the following information:

(7) Subject to subsection (8), every person required to make reports referred to in subsection (3), (4) or (6) must retain all records supporting those reports.

(8) If a person who is required to retain records under subsection (7) ceases to be in possession of uranium, plutonium-239 or thorium as set out in subsection (3) or ceases to conduct the activities set out in subsection (6), they must continue to retain all records supporting those reports for a period of five years beginning on the day on which they filed those reports with the Commission.

(9) The retention period established in subsection (7) does not have the effect of varying any other longer period specified in the Act, the regulations made under the Act or a licence for the retention of these records.

(10) Every person referred to in subsection (3) or (6) must consent and submit to verification activities conducted by the Commission and the IAEA.

Nuclear Non-proliferation Import and Export Control Regulations

3 (1) Paragraph 3(1)(a) of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Import and Export Control Regulations footnote 3 is replaced by the following:

(2) Subsection 3(1) of the Regulations is amended by striking out “and” at the end of paragraph (g), by adding “and” at the end of paragraph (h) and by adding the following after paragraph (h):

4 The Regulations are amended by adding the following after section 3:

Record Retention

3.1 Every person must retain, for a period of six years after the day on which a licence to import or export issued to them expires, the licence and all records relevant to any import or export under it, including, if applicable,

5 (1) Paragraph 4(1)(a) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(2) Subsection 4(1) of the Regulations is amended by striking out “or” at the end of paragraph (e) and by replacing paragraph (f) with the following:

(3) The portion of subsection 4(3) of the Regulations before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:

(4) Section 4 of the Regulations is amended by adding the following after subsection (3):

6 The portion of the schedule to the Regulations after the heading “Controlled Nuclear Substances, Equipment and Information” and before Part A is replaced by the following:

7 Paragraph (a) of the note at the end of paragraph A.1.1 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

8 Paragraphs (a) and (b) of the note at the end of paragraph A.1.2(c) of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

9 (1) Paragraph (b) of the note at the end of paragraph A.1.3 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(2) The note at the end of paragraph A.1.3 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by adding “or” at the end of paragraph (c) and by adding the following after paragraph (c):

10 Paragraph A.1.4 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

11 Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by adding the following after paragraph A.1.5

12 Paragraphs A.2.1.2 to A.2.1.10 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

13 Paragraph A.2.2 of Part A of the schedule to the English version of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

14 Paragraphs A.2.2.1 and A.2.2.2 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

A.2.2.2 Dissolver

Dissolver vessels or dissolvers employing mechanical devices especially designed or prepared for use in reprocessing plants referred to in paragraph A.2.2, intended for the dissolution of irradiated nuclear fuel and that are capable of withstanding hot, highly corrosive liquid, and that can be remotely loaded, operated and maintained.

15 Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by adding the following after paragraph A.2.2.4:

A.2.2.5 Neutron measurement systems for process control

Neutron measurement systems especially designed or prepared for integration and use with automated process control systems in reprocessing plants referred to in paragraph A.2.2.

16 (1) The portion of paragraph A.2.3 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:

A.2.3 Plants for the fabrication of nuclear reactor fuel elements, and equipment especially designed or prepared for that purpose, including equipment that:

(2) Paragraphs (a) to (d) of paragraph A.2.3 of Part A of the schedule to the French version of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(3) Paragraph A.2.3 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by striking out “or” at the end of paragraph (c), by adding “or” at the end of paragraph (d) and by adding the following after paragraph (d):

17 Paragraphs A.2.4.1.1(b) to (e) of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

18 (1) Paragraph A.2.4.1.2(a) of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(2) Paragraphs A.2.4.1.2(c) to (f) of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

19 Paragraphs A.2.4.2 to A.2.4.2.5 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

A.2.4.2 Especially designed or prepared auxiliary systems, equipment and components for gas centrifuge enrichment plants, including the following:

20 Paragraph A.2.4.3.1 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

21 Paragraphs A.2.4.3.2 to A.2.4.3.5 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

22 The portion of paragraph A.2.4.4.1 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations before paragraph (d) is replaced by the following:

23 Paragraphs A.2.4.4.3 to A.2.4.4.5 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

24 Paragraphs A.2.4.5.1 to A.2.4.5.3 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

25 Paragraph A.2.4.5.9(a) of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

26 Paragraph A.2.4.5.10 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

27 (1) The portion of paragraph A.2.4.5.11 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations before paragraph (c) is replaced by the following:

(2) Paragraph A.2.4.5.11(d) of Part A of the schedule to the French version of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

28 Paragraphs A.2.4.6.1 and A.2.4.6.2 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

29 Paragraphs A.2.4.7.1 to A.2.4.7.3 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

30 Paragraph A.2.4.7.4 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by replacing “AVLIS” with “Atomic Vapour Laser Isotope Separation”.

31 Paragraphs A.2.4.7.5 and A.2.4.7.6 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

32 The portion of paragraph A.2.4.7.10 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations before paragraph (c) is replaced by the following:

33 Paragraph A.2.4.7.13 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by replacing “Laser systems (AVLIS, MLIS and CRISLA)” with “Laser systems”.

34 Paragraphs A.2.4.8.3 and A.2.4.8.4 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

35 Paragraphs A.2.5.1 to A.2.5.3 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

36 Paragraph A.2.5.6 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

37 Paragraph A.2.5.8 of Part A of the schedule to the English version of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

38 Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by adding the following after paragraph A.2.5.8:

39 Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by adding the following after paragraph A.3:

40 Paragraph A.4.1 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

41 Paragraph B.1.1.1 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

42 The portion of paragraph B.1.1.2 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations before the note is replaced by the following:

43 Paragraph B.1.1.4 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

44 Paragraph B.1.1.11 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

45 The portion of paragraph B.1.1.12 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations before the note is replaced by the following:

46 (1) The portion of paragraph B.1.1.14 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations before the note is replaced by the following:

(2) The note at the end of paragraph B.1.1.14 of Part B of the schedule to the French version of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

47 Paragraph B.1.1.16 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

48 The portion of paragraph B.1.1.17 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations before the note is replaced by the following:

49 Paragraph B.1.1.18 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

50 Paragraph B.1.1.20 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

51 Paragraph B.2.1.1 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

52 (1) The portion of paragraph B.2.1.3 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations before paragraph (b) is replaced by the following:

(2) The note at the end of paragraph B.2.1.3(b) of Part B of the schedule to the English version of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(3) The second note at the end of paragraph B.2.1.3 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by adding “and” at the end of paragraph (b) and by repealing paragraph (c).

53 (1) The portion of paragraph B.2.1.6 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:

(2) Paragraph B.2.1.6 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by striking out “or” at the end of paragraph (a), by adding “and” at the end of paragraph (b) and by adding the following after paragraph (b):

54 Paragraph B.2.1.7(a) of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

55 Paragraph B.2.1.8 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

56 Paragraphs B.2.2.2(c)(1) to (3) of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

57 Paragraphs B.2.2.4 and B.2.2.5 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

58 (1) Paragraph B.2.2.6(a) of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(2) Paragraph B.2.2.6(c)(2) of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(3) Paragraph B.2.2.6 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by striking out “and” at the end of paragraph (h), by adding “and” at the end of paragraph (i) and by adding the following after paragraph (i):

59 (1) The portion of paragraph B.2.2.7 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:

(2) Paragraphs B.2.2.7(d) to (f) of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

60 The portion of paragraph B.2.2.8 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations before the note is replaced by the following:

61 Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by adding the following after paragraph B.2.2.14:

62 Paragraphs B.2.3.3 to B.2.3.5 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

63 Paragraphs B.2.4.2 to B.2.4.4 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

64 Paragraph B.2.4.5 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

65 Paragraphs B.2.5.3 and B.2.5.4 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

66 Paragraph B.2.6.2 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

67 Paragraph B.2.7.1 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

68 The portion of paragraph B.2.7.2(a) of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations before paragraph (1) is replaced by the following:

69 Paragraph B.2.7.3(b)(2) of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

70 Paragraphs B.2.7.5 and B.2.7.6 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations are replaced by the following:

71 Paragraph B.3.1 of Part B of the schedule to the Regulations is replaced by the following:

72 Paragraphs A.2.2.3 and A.2.2.4 of Part A of the schedule to the Regulations are amended by replacing “a plant for the reprocessing of irradiated fuel” with “reprocessing plants referred to in paragraph A.2.2”.

73 Part A of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by replacing “MLIS” with “molecular laser isotope separation” in the following provisions:

Administrative Monetary Penalties Regulations (Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission)

74 Items 41 and 42 of Part 2 of the schedule to the Administrative Monetary Penalties Regulations (Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission) footnote 4 are replaced by the following:
Item

Column 1

Provision

Column 2

Short-form Description

Column 3

Category

42 30(3) Failure to file a report with the Commission on the possession of uranium, plutonium-239 or thorium within the specified time B
43 30(4) Failure to file a report with the Commission on any inventory change within the specified time B
44 30(6) Failure to file a report with the Commission on specified activities within the specified time B
45 30(7) Failure to retain relevant record A
46 30(8) Failure to continue to retain record for the specified period A
47 30(10) Failure to consent and submit to verification activities B
75 Part 10 of the schedule to the Regulations is amended by adding the following in numerical order:
Item

Column 1

Provision

Column 2

Short-form Description

Column 3

Category

2 3.1 Failure to retain a record relevant to any import or export under a Commission licence for the specified period A

Coming into Force

76 These Regulations come into force on the day on which they are registered.

Terms of use and Privacy notice

Terms of use

It is your responsibility to ensure that the comments you provide do not:

  • contain personal information
  • contain protected or classified information of the Government of Canada
  • express or incite discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, sexual orientation or against any other group protected under the Canadian Human Rights Act or the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • contain hateful, defamatory, or obscene language
  • contain threatening, violent, intimidating or harassing language
  • contain language contrary to any federal, provincial or territorial laws of Canada
  • constitute impersonation, advertising or spam
  • encourage or incite any criminal activity
  • contain external links
  • contain a language other than English or French
  • otherwise violate this notice

The federal institution managing the proposed regulatory change retains the right to review and remove personal information, hate speech, or other information deemed inappropriate for public posting as listed above.

Confidential Business Information should only be posted in the specific Confidential Business Information text box. In general, Confidential Business Information includes information that (i) is not publicly available, (ii) is treated in a confidential manner by the person to whose business the information relates, and (iii) has actual or potential economic value to the person or their competitors because it is not publicly available and whose disclosure would result in financial loss to the person or a material gain to their competitors. Comments that you provide in the Confidential Business Information section that satisfy this description will not be made publicly available. The federal institution managing the proposed regulatory change retains the right to post the comment publicly if it is not deemed to be Confidential Business Information.

Your comments will be posted on the Canada Gazette website for public review. However, you have the right to submit your comments anonymously. If you choose to remain anonymous, your comments will be made public and attributed to an anonymous individual. No other information about you will be made publicly available.

Comments will remain posted on the Canada Gazette website for at least 10 years.

Please note that public email is not secure, if the attachment you wish to send contains sensitive information, please contact the departmental email to discuss ways in which you can transmit sensitive information.

Privacy notice

The information you provide is collected under the authority of the Financial Administration Act, the Department of Public Works and Government Services Act, the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement Implementation Act,and applicable regulators’ enabling statutes for the purpose of collecting comments related to the proposed regulatory changes. Your comments and documents are collected for the purpose of increasing transparency in the regulatory process and making Government more accessible to Canadians.

Personal information submitted is collected, used, disclosed, retained, and protected from unauthorized persons and/or agencies pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act and the Privacy Regulations. Individual names that are submitted will not be posted online but will be kept for contact if needed. The names of organizations that submit comments will be posted online.

Submitted information, including personal information, will be accessible to Public Services and Procurement Canada, who is responsible for the Canada Gazette webpage, and the federal institution managing the proposed regulatory change.

You have the right of access to and correction of your personal information. To seek access or correction of your personal information, contact the Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Office of the federal institution managing the proposed regulatory change.

You have the right to file a complaint to the Privacy Commission of Canada regarding any federal institution’s handling of your personal information.

The personal information provided is included in Personal Information Bank PSU 938 Outreach Activities. Individuals requesting access to their personal information under the Privacy Act should submit their request to the appropriate regulator with sufficient information for that federal institution to retrieve their personal information. For individuals who choose to submit comments anonymously, requests for their information may not be reasonably retrievable by the government institution.