Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Made Under the Judges Act: SOR/2019-103

Canada Gazette, Part II, Volume 153, Number 9

Registration
SOR/2019-103 April 15, 2019

JUDGES ACT

P.C. 2019-335 April 12, 2019

Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Justice, pursuant to subsections 44.01(5) footnote a, 44.2(4) footnote b and 47(2) and sections 49 footnote c and 52.22 footnote d of the Judges Act footnote e, makes the annexed Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Made Under the Judges Act.

Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Made Under the Judges Act

Annuities Payable to Survivors and Children of Judges Regulations

1 (1) Subsection 3(1) of the Annuities Payable to Survivors and Children of Judges Regulations footnote 1 is replaced by the following:

3 (1) On the payment of an annuity under the Act to the survivor or child of a judge or a retired judge, application in writing may be made by or on behalf of the survivor or child to the Minister for payment out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the whole or any part of the portion of any estate, legacy, succession or inheritance duties or taxes (in this section referred to as “death duties”) payable by the survivor or child that is attributable to the annuity.

(3) Paragraph 3(2)(a) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

Enhanced Survivor Annuity Regulations

2 Sections 7 and 8 of the Enhanced Survivor Annuity Regulations footnote 2 are replaced by the following:

7 If a judge makes an election, the reduction to the judge’s annuity for the purposes of subsection 44.01(2) of the Act is equal to the monthly instalments of the annuity that was granted or paid to the judge under Part I of the Act immediately before the election, less the monthly instalments of the judge’s annuity described in subparagraph 9(b)(i).

8 If a judge who opted to receive a deferred annuity has made an election and subsequently opts to receive an immediate annuity, the reduction determined under section 7 shall be revised to take into account the new period during which the monthly instalments are to be reduced.

3 (1) Paragraph 9(a) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(2) Subparagraph 9(b)(ii) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

Optional Survivor Annuity Regulations

4 Sections 7 and 8 of the Optional Survivor Annuity Regulations footnote 3 are replaced by the following:

7 If a judge makes an election, the reduction to the judge’s annuity for the purposes of subsection 44.2(2) of the Act is equal to the monthly instalments of the annuity that was granted or paid to the judge under Part I of the Act immediately before the election, less the monthly instalments of the judge’s annuity described in subparagraph 9(b)(i).

8 If a judge who opted to receive a deferred annuity has made an election and subsequently opts to receive an immediate annuity, the reduction determined under section 7 shall be revised to take into account the new period during which the monthly instalments are to be reduced.

5 (1) Paragraph 9(a) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(2) Subparagraph 9(b)(ii) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

Division of Judges’ Annuity Benefits Regulations

6 (1) Paragraph 14(1)(b) of the Division of Judges’ Annuity Benefits Regulations footnote 4 is replaced by the following:

(2) Paragraphs 14(1)(d) and (e) of the Regulations are replaced by the following:

7 (1) Subparagraph 22(a)(i) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(2) Subparagraph 22(b)(i) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(3) The portion of paragraph 22(c) of the Regulations before subparagraph (ii) is replaced by the following:

(4) The portion of paragraph 22(d) of the Regulations before subparagraph (i) is replaced by the following:

(5) The portion of paragraph 22(e) of the Regulations before subparagraph (i) is replaced by the following:

8 Paragraph 23(g) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

9 (1) The description of A in section 24 of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(2) Paragraph (b) of the description of C in section 24 of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

10 (1) Subparagraph 25(2)(b)(ii) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(2) Subsection 25(3) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

When adjustment made — infirmity

(3) If, however, the period subject to division ended as a result of the judge ceasing to hold office by reason of the infirmity referred to in paragraph 42(1.1)(b) of the Act or if, after the last day of that period and before valuation day, the judge ceased to hold office by reason of that infirmity, the adjustment is to be made as soon as practicable after the day that would have been his or her expected date of retirement, determined in accordance with paragraph 21(d), had the infirmity not occurred.

11 The portion of section 26 of the Regulations before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:

Return of contributions — deductions

26 If, on the day on which the judge ceases to hold office, he or she is not granted or paid an annuity, there must be deducted from the amount to be paid to him or her under subsection 51(1) of the Act

12 (1) The portion of subsection 27(1) of the Regulations before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:

Judge receives annuity — share of contributions

27 (1) If, on the day on which the judge ceases to hold office, he or she is granted or paid an annuity and if the share of the annuity benefits that was accorded to the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner under subsection 52.15(1) of the Act consists of a share of the contributions paid by the judge during the period subject to division, there must be deducted from the amount of the annuity paid to the judge when the adjustment takes effect

(2) Subparagraph (i) of the description of B in paragraph 27(1)(a) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(3) The description of B in paragraph 27(1)(b) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

13 (1) The portion of subsection 28(1) of the Regulations before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:

Infirmity — share of contributions

28 (1) If the judge ceased to hold office by reason of the infirmity referred to in paragraph 42(1.1)(b) of the Act and if the share of the annuity benefits that was accorded to the spouse, former spouse or former common-law partner under subsection 52.15(1) of the Act consists of a share of the contributions paid by the judge, there must be deducted from the amount of the annuity paid to the judge when the adjustment takes effect

(2) Subparagraph (i) of the description of B in paragraph 28(1)(a) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(3) The description of F in paragraph 28(1)(a) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(4) The description of B in paragraph 28(1)(b) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(5) Subparagraph (i) of the description of A in paragraph 28(2)(a) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

Coming into Force

14 These Regulations come into force on the day on which sections 237, 238 and 240 to 251 of the Budget Implementation Act, 2017, No. 2, chapter 33 of the Statutes of Canada, 2017, come into force, but if they are registered after that day, they come into force on the day on which they are registered.

REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT

(This statement is not part of the Regulations.)

Issues

These regulatory amendments will ensure consistency between the terminology used in the Judges Act, as amended by the Budget Implementation Act, 2017, No. 2 (BIA 2 2017), and the regulations that are made under it.

Background

Prior to the amendments introduced in BIA 2 2017, an order in council was required to grant all annuities under the Judges Act (i.e. to judges, as well as their survivors and children). This created inefficiencies and delays in the payment of annuities to judges on retirement, or to their survivors or children on the death of a judge or former judge. Even though most of the annuities are non-discretionary, they still required that the Governor in Council act in every instance by issuing an order in council; this “granting” of annuities is a historical practice that is no longer required in the modern era. Delays can be particularly acute during periods when Cabinet is not meeting regularly, such as during or immediately after a general election.

Recent amendments included in the BIA 2 2017 changed the mechanism for payment of most annuities under the Act by eliminating the need for an order in council to authorize payment, with consequent changes in terminology (i.e. from “granted” to “paid”). With these amendments, all future non-discretionary annuities to judges, their survivors and children will be authorized by operation of statute.

Objectives

To ensure consistency in the terminology used in the Judges Act and the regulations that are made under it, which will allow for the implementation of the change to the mechanism for the payment of most annuities under the Act.

Description

The following regulations require amendments to ensure consistency in the terminology between the Judges Act and the regulations:

This generally involves changing the word “granted” (“accordé”) to “paid” (“versé”), or simply adding a reference to “paid” annuities in appropriate circumstances.

“One-for-One” Rule

The “One-for-One” Rule does not apply to these Regulations, as there is no change in administrative costs to business.

Small business lens

The small business lens does not apply to these Regulations, as there are no costs on small business.

Rationale

These regulatory amendments bring the regulatory terminology in line with amendments to the Judges Act included in the BIA 2 2017, and are cost neutral. With respect to the statutory amendments, there will be significant administrative savings in the process required to authorize payment of each annuity. The Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs, who is responsible for administering payments under the Judges Act, will no longer be required to create a package for Cabinet consideration in every instance; rather, once the statutory criteria are met, the Commissioner can begin payments. This will eliminate a significant administrative burden.

Importantly, the statutory amendments will also benefit judges and their survivors (spouses) and children. Eliminating the need for an order in council will decrease the chances for delays in payments to judges on retirement, as well as to their survivors and/or children at the time of the death of a judge or former judge. This will allow more efficient processing of payments to which these individuals are entitled, and address concerns that would be particularly acute for the survivors and children of judges and former judges.

Contact

Anna Dekker
Judicial Affairs Section
Public Law and Legislative Services Sector
Department of Justice Canada
Email: anna.dekker@justice.gc.ca
Telephone: 613‑952‑0516