Regulations Amending and Repealing Certain Regulations Made Under the Canadian Human Rights Act (Miscellaneous Program): SOR/2022-150

Canada Gazette, Part II, Volume 156, Number 14

Registration
SOR/2022-150 June 21, 2022

CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

P.C. 2022-714 June 20, 2022

Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Justice, pursuant to section 22footnote a and subsection 43(4)footnote b of the Canadian Human Rights Actfootnote c, makes the annexed Regulations Amending and Repealing Certain Regulations Made Under the Canadian Human Rights Act (Miscellaneous Program).

Regulations Amending and Repealing Certain Regulations Made Under the Canadian Human Rights Act (Miscellaneous Program)

Canadian Human Rights Benefit Regulations

1 (1) The definitions disability income insurance plan or disability income benefit plan, health insurance plan or health benefit plan and spouse in subsection 2(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Benefit Regulations footnote 1 are repealed.

(2) The definitions child and life insurance plan in subsection 2(1) of the Regulations are replaced by the following:

child,
in relation to an employee under a benefit plan, means a child of the employee or of their spouse or common-law partner and includes any child within the meaning given that term under the plan; (enfant)
life insurance plan
means a plan, fund or arrangement, provided, furnished or offered to an employee that provides, in accordance with the terms of the plan, fund or arrangement, benefits payable either in a lump sum or by periodic payments
  • (a) on the death of the employee, to a beneficiary, survivor or dependant of the employee, or
  • (b) on the death of the spouse, the common-law partner, a child or a dependant of the employee, to the employee; (régime d’assurance-vie)

(3) The definition régime d’assurance in the French version of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

régime d’assurance
désigne un régime d’assurance-revenu en cas d’invalidité, un régime d’assurance-maladie ou un régime d’assurance-vie; (insurance plan)

(4) Paragraph (a) of the definition benefit in subsection 2(1) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(5) Subsection 2(1) of the Regulations is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order:

common-law partner,
in relation to an employee under a benefit plan, means a person with whom the employee has cohabited in a conjugal relationship for a period of at least one year before the event that causes a benefit to be paid under the terms of the plan; (conjoint de fait)
disability income insurance plan
means a plan, fund or arrangement provided, furnished or offered to an employee that provides, in accordance with the terms of the plan, fund or arrangement, benefits to the employee for loss of income because of sickness, accident or disability; (régime d’assurance-revenu en cas d’invalidité)
health insurance plan
means a plan, fund or arrangement provided, furnished or offered to or in respect of an employee that provides, in accordance with the terms of the plan, fund or arrangement, benefits for medical, hospital, nursing, drug or dental expenses or other similar expenses
  • (a) to the employee or the spouse, common-law partner, child or dependant of the employee, or
  • (b) in the case of a deceased employee, to the spouse, common-law partner, child or dependant of the employee; (régime d’assurance-maladie)

(6) Subsections 2(2) and (3) of the Regulations are repealed.

2 (1) Clauses 4(b)(ii)(A) and (B) of the Regulations are replaced by the following:

(2) Subparagraph 4(c)(i) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

3 (1) Clauses 5(e)(i)(A) and (B) of the Regulations are replaced by the following:

(2) Subparagraph 5(f)(i) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(3) Subparagraph 5(f)(iii) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

(4) Paragraph 5(g) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

4 Paragraph 7(b) of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

5 Paragraphs 8(b) and (c) of the Regulations are replaced by the following:

6 Section 9 of the Regulations is replaced by the following:

9 The provisions of any benefit plan respecting leave of absence that result in differentiation being made between employees in the rates of contribution of an employer or employees, or both, to the plan, if such differentiation consists of a reduction in the contributions required of an employee who is absent on a maternity leave of absence or on a leave of absence due to sickness, injury or disability and an increase in the contributions of the employer to the plan by reason of that reduction, do not constitute the basis of a complaint under Part III of the Act that an employer is engaging or has engaged in a discriminatory practice.

Immigration Investigation Regulations

7 The Immigration Investigation Regulations footnote 2 are repealed.

Customs and Excise Human Rights Investigation Regulations

8 The Customs and Excise Human Rights Investigation Regulations footnote 3 are repealed.

Coming into Force

9 These Regulations come into force on the day on which they are registered.

REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT

(This statement is not part of the Regulations.)

Issues

A review by the Canadian Human Rights Commission (the Commission) and Justice Canada identified two regulations made under the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) that are obsolete and should be repealed. The review also identified one regulation containing discriminatory and archaic definitions that should be amended to bring it in line with contemporary Canadian law.

Objective

The amendments have the following objectives:

Description and rationale

The two regulations, which were repealed, no longer provide any benefit to the Commission, complainants or respondents with cases before the Commission, or the Canadian public. The instruments are

The proposal also modernizes the definitions in the following regulation:

Costs

The proposal does not impose any costs to government/stakeholders.

One-for-one rule and small business lens

The one-for-one rule applies since two regulatory titles have been removed, and the proposal is considered two titles out.

Analysis under the small business lens determined that the proposal will not impact small businesses in Canada.

Contact

Amelia Calbry-Muzyka
Counsel
Human Rights Law Section
Public Law and Legislative Services Sector
Department of Justice
amelia.calbry-muzyka@justice.gc.ca / 819‑360‑9078